28TH SULTAN OF SULU & NORTH BORNEO SABAH
HRH SULTAN MUHAMMAD FADL
28th. SULTAN OF SULU & NORTH BORNEO SABAH SEAL
29TH SULTAN OF SULU
& North Borneo Sabah HRH SULTAN MUHAMMAD JAMALUL AZAM
Seal of the 29th Sultan of Sulu, son of HRH Sultan Muhammad Fadl. The inscription on the seal is :Al-Sultan Muhammad jamalul Azam (also known as Sultan Jamalul Alam ). Al-Sultan Jamalul Azam sanat 1279 / MUJAMAD DCHAMALUL ALAM SULTAN DE/ JOLO'. The Sultan Muhammad Jamalul Azam, the year 1279/ Muhammad Dchamalul Alam Sultan of Jolo'. This seal was in a letter to the Gurnur of Sandakan, AH 1279 ( AD 1879-1880 ).
SULTANATE SULU & NORTH BORNEO SABAH FLAG BEFORE 1899
SULU NORTH BORNEO SULTANATE FLAG 12 AFTER 1899 This sultanate flag has three differents kind of symbols : on the left side we find the "
zul -fiqar" or "sword of Ali " , in the central position there is a
white building, maybe the Sultan's palace, surrounding by a floreal arc. For
some scholars this symbol is the royal platform inside the palace of
the Sultan ; for someone else it represents the Mecca Door surrounding
by okir motifs. On the right side the crossed kris and budjak (spear ) are some of the traditional symbols of the Sultanate after 1899.
NORTH BORNEO
SABAH
Lease Contract
of 1878:
In
maintaining that the 1878 Grant was one of lease, a translation
of
that instrument
by
Professor Harold Conklin of Yale University U.S.A.
TRANSLATION
BY YALE PROFESSOR CONKLIN OF THE DEED OF 1878 INARABIC
CHARACTERS FOUND BY MR. QUINTERO IN WASHINGTON DC6
USA
Signature of Sultan
Mohammed Jamalul Alam
Official seal of the
Sultan of Sulu
GRANT BY THE SULTAN OF SULU OF A PERMANENT
LEASE COVERING HIS LANDS AND TERRITORIES
ON THE ISLAND OF BORNEO
Dated January 22, 1878
————
We,
Sri Paduka Maulana Al Sultan MOHAMMED JAMALUL ALAM, Son of Sari Paduka
Marhum Al Sultan MOHAMMED PULALUM, Sultan of Sulu and of all
dependencies thereof, on behalf of ourselves and for our heirs and
successors, and with the expressed desire of all Datus in common
agreement, do hereby desire to lease, of our own free will and
satisfaction, to Gustovus Baron de Overbeck of Hong Kong, and to Alfred
Dent, Esquire, of London, who act as representatives of a British
Company, together with their heirs, associates, successors, and assigns
forever and until the end of time, all rights and powers which we
possess over all territories and lands tributary to us on the mainland
of the Island of Borneo, commencing from the Pandassan River on the
east, and thence along the whole east coast as far as the Sibuku River
on the south, and including all territories, on the Pandassan River and
in the coastal area, known as Paitan, Sugut, Banggai, Labuk, Sandakan,
China-batangan, Mumiang, and all other territories and coastal lands to
the south, bordering on Darvel Bay, and as far as the Sibuku River,
together with all the islands which lie within nine miles from the
coast.
In
consideration of this (territorial?) lease, the honorable Gustavus
Baron de Overbeck and Alfred Dent, Esquire, promise to pay His Highness
Maulana Sultan Mohammed Jamalul Alam and to his heirs and successors,
the sum of five thousand dollars annually, to be paid each and every
year.
The
above-mentioned territories are from today truly leased to Mr. Gustavus
Baron de Overbeck and to Alfred Dent, Esquire, as already said,
together with their heirs, their associates (company) and to their
successors and assigns for as long as they choose or desire to use
them; but the rights and powers hereby leased shall not be transferred
to another nation, or a company of other nationality, without the
consent of Their Majesties Government.
Should
there be any dispute, or reviving of old grievances of any kind,
between us, and our heirs and successors, with Mr. Gustavus Baron de
Overbeck or his Company, then the matter will be brought for
consideration or judgment to Their Majesties’ Consul-General in Brunei.
Moreover,
if His Highness Maulana Al Sultan Mohammed Jamalul Alam, and his heirs
and successors, become involved in any trouble or difficulties
hereafter, the said honorable Mr. Gustavus Baron de Overbeck and his
Company promise to give aid and advice to us within the extent of their
ability.
This
treaty is written in Sulu, at the Palace of the Sultan Mohammed Jamalul
Alam on the 19th day of the month of Muharam, A.H. 1295; that is on the
22nd day of the month of January, year 1878.
Seal of the Sultan
Jamalul Alam
Witness to seal and signature
(Sgd.) W. H. TREACHER H.B.M.
Acting Consul General
in Borneo
The
Tausugtranslation
was rendered into English in the 1950′s. The English translation shows
the Deed of 1878 as a contract of lease The key word is the word
“padjak,” which is also the cognate of the Brunei Malay word “padjak,”
or “lease.”
Professor
Harold Conklin of Yale University
In
maintaining that the 1878 Grant was one of lease, a translation
of that instrument by Professor Harold Conklin of Yale University
Does
North Borneo Sabah really belong to the Philippines?
On
March 25, 1963, Senator Lorenzo Sumulong delivered a privileged speech
berating the Philippines claim to North Borneo (Sabah), which had been
filed by President Diosdado Macapagal on June 22, 1962. Five days
later, Senator Jovito R. Salonga delivered a point-by-point rebuttal to
Sumulong’s speech.
Below
are the full text of Sumulong’s speech and Salonga’s reply. We leave it
to our readers to judge the merits of the case as presented by the
senators 50 years ago.
Excerpts
from the speech of Salonga are also reprinted in the Philippine Daily
Inquirer in its March 5, 2013 issue in abidto shed light on the Sabah
conflict.
Here
is the full text of Senator Salonga’s rebuttal speech delivered on
March 30, 1963, which was broadcast over radio and television and
published in The Manila Times on March 31, April 1-2, 1963.
A
few days ago, Senator Lorenzo Sumulong spoke on the floor of the Senate
to air his views on the Philippines claim to North Borneo. My first
reaction was to keep my peace and observe this shocking spectacle in
silence, particularly in the light of therequestof
the British panel during the London Conference that the documents and
the records of the proceedings be considered confidential, until they
could be declassified in the normal course of diplomatic procedure. In
part, my reaction was dictated by the belief, so aptly expressed
elsewhere, that the best way to answer a bad argument is to let it go
on and that silence is the “unbearable repartee.”
But
silence could be tortured out of context and construed by others, not
familiar with the facts, as an impliedadmissionof
the weakness of the Philippine stand. And so, I decided to make this
reply, fully aware that in an exchange such as this, considering that
our claim is still pending and each side is feeling out the other’s
legal position, none but our British friends and their successors may
well profit.
The
good Senator, whose patriotism I do not propose to impugn, has hadaccessto
the confidential records and documents of the Department of Foreign
Affairs. By his own admission, he attended closed-door hearings of the
Senate Committees on Foreign Relations and National Defense, where
crucial matters of national survival and security were taken up. He
knows the classified, confidential nature of the records and documents
bearing on the Philippine claim.
Senator
Sumulong has now found it proper and imperative, if we take him
literally, to ventilate his views berating the merit and validity of
the Republic’s claim, accusing his own Government of gross ignorance
and holding in unbelievable disdain the Philippine position on the
British-sponsored Malaysia plan. He has chosen to assault the
Philippine position at a time when his own Government, by virtue of the
British request, may be said to be somewhat helpless in making, right
in our own country, an adequate, fully-documented defense of the
Philippine stand. I trust our British friends, here and across the
seas, will understand if, in defense of our position, we come prettycloseto the area of danger.
The
good Senator tells us that in view of the “importance and magnitude” of
the subject, he decided to wait “until all the relevant facts and
information” were in, that he had made his own “studies and
researches,” which on the basis of the press releases issued by his
office, must have been quite massive. The morning papers last Monday
(March 25) quoted the Senator as having bewailed, in advance of his
privilege speech, that “only one side of the problem has been presented
so far,” (meaning the Philippine side) seemingly unaware, despite the
depth and range of his studies, that in the world press, only the
British side has been given the benefit of full and favorable publicity
and that the Philippine side has been summarily dismissed, just as the
Senator dismisses it now with apparent contempt, as “shadowy”,
“dubious” and “flimsy.” It may interest the good Senator to know that
his statements, particularly on the eve of the talks in London,
consistently derogatory of the Philippine claim, were seized upon by
the English press with great delight, as if to show to the Philippine
panel how well-informed the Senator was. It is, of course, not the
fault of the Senator that the British, in an admirable show of unity,
enjoyed and were immensely fascinated by his press releases and
statements.
But
before I take up the Senator’s arguments in detail, it may be well to
set our frame of reference by restating the position of the Philippine
Government on the North Borneo claim.
Thousands
of years ago, what is now known as the Philippines and what is known
today as Borneo used to constitute a single historical, cultural,
economic unit. Authoritative Western scientists have traced the land
bridges that connected these two places. The inhabitants of the
Philippines and Borneo come from the same racial stock, they have the
same color, they have or used to have similar customs and traditions.
Borneo is only 18 miles away from us today.
North
Borneo, formerly known as Sabah, was originally ruled by the Sultan of
Brunei. In 1704, in gratitude for help extended to him by the Sultan of
Sulu in suppressing a revolt, the Sultan of Brunei ceded North Borneo
to the Sulu Sultan.
Here,
our claim really begins. Over the years, the various European
countries, including Britain, Spain and the Netherlands acknowledged
the Sultan of Sulu as the sovereign ruler of North Borneo. They entered
into various treaty arrangements with him.
In
1878, a keen Austrian adventurer, by the name of Baron de Overbeck,
having known that the Sultan of Sulu was facing a life-and-death
struggle with the Spanish forces in the Sulu Archipelago, went to Sulu,
took advantage of the situation and persuaded the Sultan of Sulu to
lease to him, in consideration of a yearly rental of Malayan $ 5,000
(roughly equivalent to a meager US $ 1,600), the territory now in
question. The contract of lease — and I call it so on the basis of
British documents and records that cannot be disputed here or abroad —
contains a technical description of the territory in terms of natural
boundaries, thus:
“…all
the territories and lands being tributary to us on the mainland of the
island of Borneo commencing from the Pandassan River on the NW coast
and extending along the whole east coast as far as the Sibuco River in
the South and comprising among others the States of Peitan, Sugut,
Bangaya, Labuk, Sandakan, Kinabatangan, Muniang and all the other
territories and states to the southward thereof bordering on Darvel Bay
and as far as the Sibuco River with all the islands within 3 marine
leagues of the coast.”
Overbeck
later sold out all his rights under the contract to Alfred Dent, an
English merchant, who established a provisional association and later a
Company, known as the British North Borneo Company, which assumed all
the rights and obligations under the 1878 contract. This Company was
awarded a Royal Charter in 1881. A protest against the grant of the
charter was lodged by the Spanish and the Dutch Governments and in
reply, the British Government clarified its position and stated in
unmistakable language that “sovereignty remains with the Sultan of
Sulu” and that the Company was merely an administering authority.
In
1946, the British North Borneo Company transferred all its rights and
obligations to the British Crown. The Crown, on July 10, 1946 — just
six days after Philippine independence — asserted full sovereign rights
over North Borneo, as of that date. Shortly thereafter former American
Governor General Harrison, then Special Adviser to the Philippine
Government on Foreign Affairs, denounced the Cession Order as a
unilateral act in violation of legal rights. In 1950, Congressman
Macapagal — along with Congressmen Arsenio Lacson and Arturo Tolentino
— sponsored a resolution urging the formal institution of the claim to
North Borneo. Prolonged studies were in the meanwhile undertaken and in
1962 the House of Representatives, in rare unanimity, passed a
resolution urging the President of the Philippines to recover North
Borneo consistent with international law and procedure. Acting on this
unanimous resolution and having acquired all the rights and interests
of the Sultanate of Sulu, the Republic of the Philippines, through the
President, filed the claim to North Borneo.
Our
claim is mainly based on the following propositions: that Overbeck and
Dent, not being sovereign entities nor representing sovereign entities,
could not and did not acquire dominion and sovereignty over North
Borneo; that on the basis of authoritative British and Spanish
documents, the British North Borneo Company, a private trading concern
to whom Dent transferred his rights, did not and could not acquire
dominion and sovereignty over North Borneo; that their rights were as
those indicated in the basic contract, namely, that of a lessee and a
mere delegate; that in accordance with established precedents in
International Law, the assertion of sovereign rights by the British
Crown in 1946, in complete disregard of the contract of 1878 and their
solemn commitments, did not and cannot produce legal results in the
form of a new tide.
I
shall not, for the moment, take issue with the Senator as to his
statement of the problem sought to be solved either through the
Malaysia plan or the Greater Malayan Confederation. Our commitments
under the United Nations Charter, the Bandung Conference Declaration
and the 1960 decolonization resolution of the General Assembly are
matters of record and there is no quarrel about them.
Let
us deal now with Senator Sumulong’s analysis of the “relevant facts”.
He begins by saying that “since the organization of the United Nations
in 1945, Britain in accordance with the obligations imposed by the
Charter has declared herself to be the colonial power administering
North Borneo as a British colony”. There is something misleading in
this naked assertion. The good Senator could have informed the people,
having proclaimed knowledge of all the relevant facts, that the British
Crown never considered North Borneo as British territory, nor the North
Borneans as British subjects, until July 10, 1946 — six days after the
Philippines became independent. He may well have asked himself, “Why
July 10, 1946?” and thereafter report to the Senate and to the people
he loves so well the results of his new inquiry.
Then,
with the air of a magistrate delivering a stinging rebuke, he asks:
“Why was the Philippine claim of sovereignty to North Borneo so tardily
presented in the United Nations?” Yet, in the next breath, the good
Senator reassures everyone that “I am and have been in favor of our
government giving every possible support to the proprietary claims of
the heirs of the late Sultan Jamalul Kiram.” Now, let us examine these
interesting assertions a little more closely.
(1)
If the Senator believes that the claim of sovereignty was so “tardily
presented”, how could the proprietary claim of dominion or ownership —
which is the main element of sovereignty — regardless of whether it is
the Philippine Government or not that institutes the claim — be
considered still seasonable and appropriate?
(2)
If the Senator suggests now that the proprietary claim is not yet tardy
and that the Government should merely support, “the heirs of the
Sultan” in this aspect of the claim, how can he turn around and say
that it is late if it is the Government that is instituting the claim?
Be it noted that the Philippine claim includes sovereignty and dominion
over North Borneo.
(3)
But what arouses my curiosity is the bald statement of the Senator that
he is and has always been in favor of supporting the proprietary claims
of the “heirs of the Sultan of Sulu.” Well, that must have been quite a
long time! The Senator cannot therefore blame us, since he has invited
and provoked the inquiry, if we now file a bill of particulars. Did he
really support the proprietary aspect of the claim since he first
became a member of the House of Representatives and assumed the
Chairmanship of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs? Probably he did
not give much thought to it then. But certainly he must have heard of
the Macapagal-Lacson-Tolentino resolution of 1950. Did he give it in
the Senate active and real support, even in its proprietary aspects? He
has been a member of that distinguished body for more than 12 years —
when, how and in what form, (even through a proposed amendment so as to
fit his thinking) did he give that support? The cold, lifeless records
of Congress yield no evidence of what he now eloquently professes.
The
distinguished Senator makes a most interesting suggestion. He tells his
colleagues in the Senate and the Filipino people that “the heirs of the
Sultan of Sulu” should have gone to the United Nations, presumably to
the International Court of Justice, so that if the said heirs lose
their case, “there would be no loss of honor or prestige for the
Republic of the Philippines.” I would commend to the good Senator a
closer reading of the Statute of the International Court of Justice, in
relation to Chapter 14 of the United Nations Charter. Undoubtedly, he
must have known that “the heirs of the Sultan” could not possibly
litigate before the International Court of Justice for the simple
reason that they have no international legal personality. They do not
constitute a State, as that term is understood in law. Chapter 2,
Article 34, paragraph 1 of the Statute clearly provides: “Only States
may be parties in cases before the Court.”
The
same thing may well be said of his suggestion that the heirs file a
reservation or a petition before the United Nations. And were we to
follow the logic of the good Senator, we might conclude that America,
Britain, France, the Netherlands and other countries have no more
prestige and honor to keep since they have, as a matter of cold fact,
lost quite a number of cases before international bodies and tribunals.
But, of course, the conclusion is wrong. For respect for the rule of
law has never meant and should never mean loss of honor and prestige.
Then,
the good Senator tells us that “contrary to the impression created in
the minds of our people, the claim of sovereignty put forward by our
Government as transferee of the Sultan of Sulu does not cover the
entire area of North Borneo but only a portion thereof.” I do not know
who created this impression, or whether the Senator has had a hand in
it, through his own statements. However, the scope of our claim is
clear: we are claiming these portions of North Borneo which were
leased, as clearly defined and described in the contract of 1878 and
which are still under the de facto control and administration of the
British Crown. But the good Senator would like to know what are the
“exact metes and bounds” and gloats over the seeming inability of the
people in the Foreign Affairs Department to tell him what are the exact
boundaries. International law, it may be well to remind our good
Senator, does not require exact, rigid definition of a territory by
metes and bounds. In the language of international law authorities of
the highest repute, “rigidly fixed boundaries are not indispensable and
boundaries of a territory may be indicated by natural signs, such as
rivers, mountains, deserts, forests and the like.” (See, for example
the decision of the German-Polish Mixed Arbitral Tribunal, August
1,1929). Up to now, ancient nations, such as India and China, are still
quarreling about their boundaries. In other words, Senator Sumulong is
exacting of his own government more than what International Law
requires of us. But no matter. The lease contract of 1878 tells us in
specific terms the natural boundaries and I do not think Senator
Sumulong can improve on it. Nor can the British, if we consider as
correct the conclusions of reputable writers abroad that the dividing
boundary lines between the Borneo territories are neither
fully-surveyed nor well-defined (See, for example, North Borneo, Brunei
and Sarawak, Country Survey Series, New Haven, 1956).
It
may be well for us, on such a delicate matter as this, to refrain from
accusing our own Government of ignorance, partly out of simple
discretion and partly because the real difference between most of us is
that we are ignorant on different subjects — it may be the best thing
indeed not to talk about each other’s ignorance.
Incidentally,
the good Senator cites Professor Tregonning of the University of
Singapore, who wrote a book on the subject, “Under Chartered Company
Rule” to support his own — not Tregonning’s — conclusion that Overbeck
and Dent — the two adventurers whose exploits the good Senator
carefully avoided mentioning — “evaluated the rights acquired from the
Sultan of Brunei to be 3 times greater than the rights acquired from
the Sultan of Sulu, the yearly payment to the former being Malayan $
15,000 and to the latter Malayan $ 5,000.” His conclusion is not
supported by the authority he cites. Let me quote from Tregonning
himself:
“This
meager rental (of Malayan $ 15,000 paid to the Sultan of Brunei)
reflects the state of affairs. The territory had long ceased to be
under Brunei control and failed to bring in any revenue. The Sultan
received Malayan $ 15,000 for nothing and he was well pleased.” (p. 14).
Likewise,
in reading Tregonning, the good Senator avoided telling the people that
the history professor he cited characterized the yearly payment of
Malayan $ 5,000 to the Sultan of Sulu as “annual rental” (p. 14), that
the British Colonial Office objected strenuously to the grant of the
Royal Charter to the British North Borneo Company, “considering that no
private company should exercise sovereign rights” (p. 20) and that the
highest British officials were reassuring one another that the Royal
Charter awarded to the British North Borneo Company did not vest the
sovereignty of the territory in the British Government (at pp. 27-29).
Assuming
that we fail to recover North Borneo, the good Senator insists that “we
would appear as attempting to colonize North Borneo without any lawful
or just cause.” How can Senator Sumulong damn his own country as a
colonizer when it is precisely submitting its claim, based on historic
and legal considerations, in accordance with the peaceful procedures
indicated in the United Nations Charter? How can he, on the other hand,
have nothing but praise for Malaya which, without any claim at all and
virtually a stranger in the region, desires to take over — thanks to
British support — the Bornean territories?
Like
the isolationists of old, Senator Sumulong asks us: What is the gain of
involving ourselves in North Borneo, if after all, even if we recover
it, we are committed to the idea of letting the North Borneans
determine what their eventual fate would be? It is like asking a man
what is the use of working if after all he would eventually fade away —
and leave his properties to his kin. One of the rosiest chapters in our
entire history as a people was written when we dispatched our young men
to Korea to fight for the cause of freedom in that part of the world. I
don’t remember Senator Sumulong having raised the question, “What’s the
use of it all?” The good Senator seems to forget that what happens in
North Borneo affects us with greater immediacy and impact because of
its proximity to us, that the North Borneans come from the same racial
stock, that years of political isolation and hostile propaganda have
created a gap between our two peoples, that despite the proud assertion
that British interests have administered North Borneo for many years,
the British, by their own admission, have not prepared the Borneans for
self-government, that the natives are backward, that they are under the
economic, cultural and political domination of the Chinese and that
according to the British-prepared Report (Cobbold) there exists in
North Borneo “fertile material on which Communist infiltration could
work in the same way as it is already working in Sarawak.” The
Communist danger, the Cobbold Report states, “cannot be excluded for
the future.” (p. 36).
Senator
Sumulong is all praise for the success and the leadership of the Tungku
of Malaya and from these coupled with “British military and economic
aid”, he jumps to the conclusion that “the enlarged Federation of
Malaysia under the same leadership and with continued British military
and economic aid will be able to meet and overcome any communist
attempt to capture Singapore, Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo.” But
anyone who has studied logic must surely see that that is a mighty, big
jump. Since the Tungku succeeded in fighting Communism in his home
base, the Senator is certain he will also succeed elsewhere even if the
conditions are quite different. This must be a new brand of logic! For
one thing, there is the simple matter of geography. The Tungku
Government is a thousand miles away from the jungles of Borneo. For
another, the Borneo peoples, particularly in North Borneo, are not
quite prepared for self-government. And how can the distinguished
Senator be so sure about “continued British military and economic aid”,
when Britain no longer requires a military outpost in this area as an
essential link in her claim of defense, when the usefulness of fixed
bases — such as Singapore — has been rendered obsolete by new
developments in nuclear warfare and when England, beset by economic
problems and stymied by many commitments, must of necessity launch a
program of progressive withdrawal from Southeast Asia? The good Senator
did not care to tell our people that the whole concept of Malaysia was
designed to sterilize Singapore, that the whole plan was intended to
redress Chinese dominance in Singapore and Malaya and that the
Federation was not conceived out of a sense of oneness, or of racial or
ethnic unity, or of a common heritage, but out of mutual fear and
distrust. How can a Federation — so conceived and designed — endure,
much less bring stability to a region where the countries immediately
involved — the Philippines and Indonesia — have not even been
consulted? The British may well be wrong here, just as they were proved
wrong in their evaluation of Singapore on the eve of the Second World
War (remember how the British thought it could “stand a long siege” and
yet this “key base” fell in less than a week’s time?) and just as they
are now being proved wrong in Africa where the British-inspired Central
African Federation is about ready to collapse. And if the Malaysia
Federation should fail and become instead the focal center of Communist
infection, what does the good Senator intend to do? Isn’t it rather
ironic that whereas in some responsible British quarters, including a
sector of the British press, there has arisen a lurking doubt as to the
feasibility of the Malaysia plan, the good Senator should be so certain
about its success?
The
respected Senator tells us that he cannot say whether the Greater
Confederation plan is a better substitute. I thought he had all the
relevant facts. And if he did not have all the relevant facts, may it
not have been the better part of prudence to give the higher officials
of the Department of Foreign Affairs all the chance to explain the
outlines of the plan? But as I said earlier, the good Senator had
access to the Government’s Confidential Report. He knows or should know
that incisive studies have been made and completed since last year on
the Greater Confederation Plan by an Ad Hoc Committee, composed of
professors and scholars in the University of the Philippines. Surely,
he does not expect his Government to spell out the Confederation Plan
to the last detail at this time, before an agreement in principle is
reached among the proposed members. Assuming that the Greater
Confederation Plan does not convince the good Senator, after a careful
reading of the studies that have been completed, can he not possibly
render service to the Republic by suggesting positive, meaningful
alternatives, having in mind his massive research and studies on the
subject?
Our
distinguished Senator has but one suggestion. I quote him:
“…the
better course to follow is for our government to inform the United
Nations in due time, i.e., when the Federation of Malaysia Plan is
submitted for consideration in the United Nations, that we are
voluntarily relinquishing whatever claims of sovereignty we may have to
any portion of North Borneo in order to accelerate the changing of its
status from a non-self-governing territory to that of a self-governing
or independent State and that we favor holding a plebiscite under UN
auspices to give the people of North Borneo the opportunity to freely
express their will and wishes…”
In
short, the good Senator would have us tell the world we are abandoning
our claim, let Malaya take over North Borneo under the so-called
Malaysia Federation, then ask for a referendum in North Borneo to
ascertain what the North Borneans want. This, to my mind, is a proposal
so naive it does not do justice to the reputation of the distinguished
Senator or to the depth and range of his studies. In the first place, a
Federation plan need not be approved by the United Nations. In the
second place, a sophisticated study of the results of a plebiscite
under the circumstances set forth by the distinguished Senator (and
having in mind the plebiscites that have already been held, where there
was indeed no choice but to say “yes” to what the British and Malayans
wanted) forecloses the kind of result that will be achieved. For so
long the North Borneans have been under British tutelage; the Malaysia
plan is British-conceived, British-inspired and British-sponsored;
Malaya is raring to take over a territory whose native inhabitants,
according to the Cobbold Report, have a low level of education and
political consciousness and who were ready to agree to the Malaysia
proposals “although they were not fully understood.” Now, what kind of
free elections does the Senator expect to witness in North Borneo?
In
fine, the Senator would have the Republic launch a program of defeat —
born of fear and doubt and timidity. I cannot agree to such a plan of
action.
We
have told the British that we agree that their interests in the region
should be respected and that we welcome any practical arrangements to
this end. But this should not take the form of colonialism in a
different guise which, instead of being a factor of stability becomes
the source of endless provocation. The Philippines is here in Southeast
Asia to stay; Britain, saddled with various commitments, probably
desires to play a lesser role in Southeast Asia and make a graceful
exit; Malaya, a distant stranger to the region, desires a virtual
annexation of the Bornean territories to sterilize and quarantine
Singapore, the “key base”, which is predominantly Chinese and, whose
loyalties are not beneath suspicion. A professor in an Australian
University, writing in the India Quarterly, makes a thorough analysis
of the Malaysia Plan and sees great difficulties ahead.
“Even
in North Borneo and Sarawak the indigenous peoples are not happy about
a federation. Their own racial problems are much simpler and their
economic prosperity does not require any political integration with
Malaya. In any case, Borneo territories are extremely jealous of their
imminent independence which they are reluctant to submerge in a
federation.
“It
is also unclear how the central (Tungku) government located in Kuala
Lumpur would be able to exercise effective control over those
territories, which are separated by South China sea from Malaya by
varying distances, from about 500 miles to well over a thousand.
Jesselton is nearer to Saigon or to Manila than to Kuala Lumpur. In
area British Borneo is about the same as Malaya, but its 1400 mile long
coast line is longer than the Federation’s. Defense, in the event of a
crisis, from Malaya would be difficult…” (Singhal, D.P., Imperial
Defence, Communist Challenge and the Great Design).
The
good Senator realizes, of course, that if North Borneo should fall into
hostile hands, it is the Philippines that will be immediately affected.
And yet until we filed our claim to North Borneo and talks were
conducted thereafter in London culminating in an official cognizance of
our claim, there was no attempt at all to consult with us on matters
that affect the very survival and security of this country. It is only
now that Britain and Malaya have become increasingly appreciative of
our stand and their willingness not to prejudice our claim despite
Malaysia is certainly a great credit to the Administration. If between
now and August 31,1963, the scheduled date of birth of the Malaysia
Federation, these countries should stiffen in their attitude towards
our claim, I must state in all candor that for all my respect for him
and even assuming the nobility of his motives, the good Senator cannot
fully escape the burden of responsibility,
I
am no apologist for the President of the Philippines, not even on the
North Borneo question and will disagree with him whenever I think that
his action is not well-advised. But I believe that on such a
fundamental question as this, it may be well for us to remember that
political considerations, bitterness and endless quibbling should stop
at the water’s edge and that the claim to North Borneo is not the claim
of the President, nor of the Liberal Party, nor of his Administration,
but a claim of the entire Republic, based on respect for the rule of
law, the sanctity of contractual obligations, the sacredness of facts
and the relentless logic of our situation in this part of the world.
Privilege
Speech of Senator Lorenzo Sumulong on the Sabah Claim
Philippine
Senate, March 25, 1963
I
have refrained from discussing on the floor of the Senate the Malaysia
plan or the alternative plan of a Greater Malayan Confederation
proposed by President Macapagal in connection with the Philippine claim
of sovereignty to a portion of North Borneo, while the Senate
Committees on Foreign Relations and National Defense and Security were
holding joint closed-door hearings in Camp Murphy.
As
your Chairman of the Committee on Foreign Relations, I had made my own
studies and researches, but I thought that there might be new facts and
considerations which our defense and foreign affairs officials might
bring to our attention during the briefing.
Now
that the briefing is over and the administration experts have submitted
to the two Committees all the facts within their knowledge and
possession, I believe it is already proper, nay, I believe it is my
duty to submit for the consideration of the entire Senate and of our
people the facts and considerations which I believe are material and
necessary to the formation and crystallization of an intelligent
opinion about the two plans. In so doing, I want to make clear the
responsibility for the facts and considerations I am about to present
is my own.
I
want to make clear that I am always subject to correction. If my facts
and considerations are wrong, I would be ready to admit and correct my
mistakes. And I do hope that others will do likewise.
Our
commitments
Under
the United Nations Charter, it is the duty of every colonial power
administering non-self-government or independence and until that people
has been made self-governing or independent, it is the duty of the
colonial power to submit to the United Nations every year a report of
its administration of the territory.
The
duty of the administering power to prepare the non-self-governing
territory for self-government or independence is provided for in
Chapter XI, Article 73 b of the United Nations Charter which makes it
the duty of the administering power “to develop self-government, to
take due account of the political aspirations of the
(non-self-governing) peoples and to assist them in the progressive
development of their free political institutions.”
No
RP Protest
Since
the organization of the United Nations in 1945, Britain in accordance
with the obligations imposed by the Charter has declared herself to be
the colonial power administering Sarawak as British colony and has been
submitting to the United Nations every year a report of her
administration of these three non-self-governing territories. During
all that time, the Philippines as a member of the United Nations has
not put forward any claim of sovereignty over North Borneo, nor has the
Philippines registered any reservation or protest to the report
submitted by Britain to the United Nations every year as the
administering power over North Borneo. It was only in December of last
year (1962) that the Philippine delegation, during the consideration of
the yearly report of the British administration over North Borneo in
the Trusteeship Committee, made a reservation contesting for the first
time the right of the British to rule and administer North Borneo.
Belated
claim
Why
was the Philippine claim of sovereignty to North Borneo so tardily
presented in the United Nations? The answer is that North Borneo is not
a part of the national territory of the Philippines as defined and
delimited in our Constitution. When the United Nations was organized in
1945, the claimants to North Borneo was not the Philippines but the
heirs of the late Sultan Jamalul Kiram who died in 1936. If the said
heirs had any claims to sovereignty over North Borneo — as
distinguished from their proprietary claims — they could have filed a
petition or a reservation to the United Nations protesting against
British rule and administration over North Borneo, but they did not
file any such petition or reservation. It was only in February of last
year (1962) that the said heirs informed our Department of Foreign
Affairs that they were claiming sovereignty to North Borneo and they
offered to turn over such claim of sovereignty to the Republic of the
Philippines, reserving however to themselves their proprietary claims.
This
offer was accepted by President Macapagal and to give semblance of
legality to the transfer of sovereignty from the said heirs to the
Republic of the Philippines, in September of last year (1962) out of
the several surviving heirs of Sultan Jamalul Kiram who died in 1936,
Esmail Kiram was proclaimed the new Sultan of Sulu claiming to possess
all the attributes and prerogatives of a sovereign ruler and as such he
executed a deed of cession of his alleged claim of sovereignty to North
Borneo in favor of the Republic of the Philippines.
A
mistake
I
am and have always been in favor of our government giving every
possible support to the proprietary claims of the heirs of the late
Sultan Jamalul Kiram. But I have always believed as I still believe
that it was a mistake for President Macapagal to have agreed to such
transfer of the claim of sovereignty from the said heirs to the
Republic of the Philippines for the following reasons:
(1)
The said heirs had never filed a petition or reservation before the
United Nations claiming sovereignty to North Borneo and protesting
British rule and administration thereof. Since the transferee acquires
no better rights than the transferor, this weakens the present claim of
the Republic of the Philippines.
(2)
Even if the said heirs had a strong claim of sovereignty to North
Borneo, our government should have advised them to file a petition or
reservation to that effect before the United Nations, instead of
agreeing to a transfer of such claim of sovereignty to the Republic of
the Philippines. If the said heirs lose their case before the United
Nations, there would be no loss of honor of prestige for the Republic
of the Philippines. As it is now, if the belated claim of sovereignty
of the Republic of the Philippines to a portion of North Borneo does
not prosper in the United Nations, the damage to our national honor and
prestige would be incalculable. We would appear as attempting to
colonize North Borneo without any lawful or just cause, contrary to our
vehement denunciations of colonialism and our loud demands that the
grant of self-government or independence to subject peoples be
accelerated. Even if the United Nations should sustain the belated
Philippine claim of sovereignty to North Borneo, we stand to gain
nothing because we are committed to speedily end our rule and
administration there, grant its people self-government or independence
and respect their will and wishes as to whether they will join the
Federation of Malaysia or the Greater Malayan Confederation proposed by
President Macapagal.
(3)
Contrary to the impression created in the minds of our people, the
claim of sovereignty put forward by our government as transferee of the
Sultan of Sulu does not cover the entire area of North Borneo, but only
a portion thereof. This was admitted by the Philippine panel during the
London talks, but the administration of President Macapagal has kept
mum and has not brought this important fact to the attention of our
people. During our joint committee meetings in Camp Murphy, I asked the
members of the Philippine panel present if they could tell us the exact
metes and bounds and the exact area of this portion of North Borneo
claimed by our government but none could give us a positive answer.
This was amazing in the extreme. When a man sues in court to recover
title and possession to a piece of land, the first thing he has to
prove in court is the identity of the land. But here is the
administration of President Macapagal involving the honor and prestige
of our government in a claim of sovereignty to a portion of North
Borneo, without being able to tell us the identity of that portion. And
yet, administration stalwarts have been daring the British to have the
case tried and decided by the International Court of Justice.
From
the compilation of documents submitted to us by Minister Benito
Bautista of the Department of Foreign Affairs, I found that before
Overbeck and Dent entered into the contract of January 12,1878 with the
Sultan of Sulu, they had previously obtained from the Sultan of Brunei
four other similar contracts on December 29,1877. As narrated by K. G.
Tregonning in his book entitled Under Chartered Company Rule and borne
out by the descriptions contained in the four contracts of the Sultan
of Brunei.
“The
Sultan (of Brunei), in three grants of territory from Gaya Bay on the
west coast to the Sibuco River on the east; and the Pengeran Tumongong
(heir to the Sultan of Brunei) in a grant of his west coast
possessions, the rivers Kimanis and Benowi, ceded to Overbeck and Dent,
with all the powers of sovereignty, some 28,000 square miles of
territory, embracing 900 miles of North Bornean coastline, for a total
yearly payment of Malayan $ 5,000.” (op.cit. P-14)
In
the later contract with the Sultan of Sulu, the territory ceded to
Overbeck and Dent was from the Pandassan River on the west coast to the
Sibuco River on the east, for which the Sultan of Sulu was to receive a
yearly payment of Malayan $ 5,000. A look at the map of North Borneo
will show that Gaya Bay is farther to the west than Pandassan River. So
the territory ceded under the four contracts with the Sultan of Brunei
was more extensive and embraced the territory ceded under the contract
with the Sultan of Sulu. Why did Overbeck and Dent still contracted
with the Sultan of Sulu for territory already ceded to them under the
four contracts with the Sultan of Brunei? According to Professor
Tregonning in his aforecited book, after Overbeck and Dent had
negotiated the four contracts with the Sultan of Brunei, they learned
later that the northeast coast, which comprised a large portion of the
territory ceded by the Sultan of Brunei, was in the hands of the Sultan
of Sulu who claimed to have received it from the Sultan of Brunei in
1704 in return for the help in suppressing a rebellion and it was for
this reason that they negotiated the contract with the Sultan of Sulu
on January 12,1878 (op. cit. pp. 11,14-15). From this it appears that
the territory claimed and ceded by the Sultan of Sulu on January 12,
1878 was likewise claimed and had been previously ceded by the Sultan
of Brunei on December 29,1877 and that Overbeck and Dent evaluated the
rights acquired from the Sultan of Brunei to be three times greater
than the rights acquired from the Sultan of Sulu, the yearly payment to
the former being Malayan $ 15,000 and to the latter Malayan $ 5,000. It
is small wonder that the administration of President Macapagal is at a
loss to identify the portion of North Borneo subject of their claim of
sovereignty.
Common
concern
It
should be the common concern of the Philippines and of all countries
whose peoples believe in the free and democratic way of life, to see to
it that Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo, are not only speedily
decolonized and granted self-government or independence, but also
adequately safeguarded against the danger of communist infiltration and
subversion once they become self-governing or independent.
The
balance of power in Asia between the forces of freedom on the one hand
and the forces of communism on the other, is in a very precarious and
critical posture today. Laos has turned neutralist. The ruler of
Cambodia has decided to align himself on the side of Red China. South
Vietnam is facing a life and death struggle with the Viet Congs.
India’s borders have been invaded by Red China. If Sarawak, Brunei,
North Borneo and Singapore, should be lost to the free world by their
turning communist or neutralist, the peace and security of the free
world countries in Asia including the Philippines would be gravely
imperilled.
We
in the Philippines are firmly and uncompromisingly against communism.
Whether under the former Nacionalista administration or under the
present Liberal administration, that has been our consistent policy. We
are a religious people and we cannot accept a godless ideology. We want
progress, but we do not want to achieve progress through dictatorship
and violence; we want to achieve progress through freedom and peaceful
reform.
In
the fight between the forces of freedom and the forces of communism, we
do not believe in being neutralist or non-aligned. We want to stand up
and be counted on the side of the forces of freedom.
And
because the military power of the forces of communism is great due to
their tremendous human and material resources, no nation can resist and
fight them alone and unaided. The forces of freedom must combine and
cooperate militarily and economically in order to balance the military
and economic power of the forces of communism. Thus, we have entered
into defensive alliances like the mutual defense pact with the US and
the SEATO pact.
British
plan
The
Federation of Malaysia is the British plan of giving self-government to
Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo and at the same time safeguard them
against communist infiltration and subversion. Under the plan, Britain
will relinquish sovereignty over Sarawak and North Borneo and withdraw
protection over Brunei and then these three newly independent states
will join the 11 states now composing the Federation of Malaya and
Singapore in forming the Federation of Malaysia. In other words, the
present Federation of Malaya will be enlarged by bringing in Singapore,
Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo as new members and as thus enlarged it
will be renamed Federation of Malaysia. The present mutual defense pact
between Britain and the Federation of Malaya will then be extended to
this enlarged Federation of Malaysia.
The
plan is to follow the same pattern by which Malaya was given
independence on August 31, 1957 and by means of a mutual defense pact
with the former mother country (Britain), receive such military and
economic aid to enable her to fight communist infiltration and
subversion successfully.
Let
us recall the history of Malaya. For a hundred years, Malaya was under
British rule before she won her independence on August 31, 1957. Malaya
is a Federation of 11 states, two of which were formerly British
colonies and the remaining nine were formerly protectorates. Under her
constitution, these 11 states upon becoming independent agreed to form
a Federation with a federal parliament composed of two houses in which
each of the 11 states was given representation.
When
she became independent in 1957, Malaya was faced with a grave internal
problem of communist infiltration and subversion. In population, the
Chinese is the second biggest in number, next only to the Malays, so
that the danger of Chinese communist infiltration and subversion was
real and acute. This danger had to be met realistically and the leaders
of Malaya realized that it had to be fought not only with military but
also with economic weapons, for which they needed British aid and
cooperation. So, the leaders of Malaya evolved a five-year development
plan to improve the livelihood of the people so that they will not be
enticed by communist propaganda harping on the poverty of the masses
and promising a classless society where there will be no poor and no
rich. This five-year development plan involved an expenditure of
Malayan $ 1,358,000,000 and the British government agreed to give
extensive financial help to it and the plan was so well implemented
that Malaya has achieved an economic progress next only to Japan in the
whole Far East as shown by her per capita income which is second only
to Japan. Also, there was a British grant of Malayan $ 114 million for
the establishment of the federal armed forces of Malaya and for the
first three years a yearly grant of Malayan $ 25 million to help Malaya
deal with the terrorist problem. Through these economic and military
measures, Malaya under the leadership of Tungku Abdul Rahman was able
to break the communist backbone in that country, in the same way that
through similar economic and military measures, Magsaysay was able to
break the communist backbone here in our country, so that the names of
Abdul Rahman and Magsaysay rank high in the roster of successful
communist fighters in Asia.
Because
of the success of the Federation of Malaya under the leadership of
Abdul Rahman and with the British military and economic aid to fight
communist infiltration and subversion, it is also expected that the
enlarged Federation of Malaysia under the same leadership of Abdul
Rahman and with continued British military and economic aid will be
able to meet and overcome any communist attempt to capture Singapore,
Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo through infiltration and subversive
activities.
It
is pertinent to point out that Singapore, Sarawak, Brunei and North
Borneo are outside the SEATO area so that they cannot rely on the SEATO
for protection against communism. Neither can they rely on US military
or economic aid, since the present trend in American foreign policy as
manifested in Senator Mansfield’s position is to cut down on American
foreign aid by not giving to those countries to which the US has not
heretofore given aid and to gradually reduce the amount as to those
countries to which the US has been giving aid. It is only Britain which
can be expected to extend military and economic aid to these countries
once they become independent because Britain is their former mother
country and because of the close trade and economic ties that will have
to continue even after the severance of political ties between’ them.
Alternative
plan
Let
me now turn to the Greater Confederation of Malay States proposed by
President Macapagal. Is this a better substitute to the Malaysia plan
as an instrumentality to make Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo safe and
secure against communist infiltration and subversion once these
countries become self-governing or independent? According to President
Macapagal, it is a better substitute. For my part, I cannot say whether
it is a better substitute or not, for the simple reason that its
proponents cannot give us any information as to what concretely and
specifically are the plans and the ways and means by which this Greater
Malayan Confederation is expected to help protect Sarawak, Brunei and
North Borneo against communist infiltration and subversion. All that we
are told is that the proposed members of are Malaya, Singapore,
Sarawak, Brunei, North Borneo and the Philippines. According to
President Macapagal in a recent interview with a correspondent of
Agence de France, all that he could say was that the proposed members
will retain their separate sovereignties. This means that the
Philippine claim to a portion of North Borneo will be given so that
North Borneo may become independent and sovereign and thus qualify to
be a member of this Greater Malayan Confederation. I have asked before
and I now again ask: Is it the plan that this Greater Malayan
Confederation will not seek any outside military or economic aid either
from Britain or from the US and that each member state will just rely
on her own military and economic resources to fight communist
infiltration and subversion? Is the Philippines ready to extend
military and economic aid to North Borneo, Brunei and Sarawak and if
so, how much is the present administration willing to appropriate for
this purpose? What joint and common measures will the member states
take in order to help each other in fighting communist infiltration and
subversion? Will there be a common armed force? Will there be a common
economic program? Or will this be a purely social club? These questions
are relevant, material and pertinent and must be answered by President
Macapagal and the proponent of the Greater Malayan Confederation,
before they can expect any Filipino to rally to its support and before
they can expect the proposed member-states of such Confederation to be
convinced that it is a better and more effective instrument than the
Malaysia plan to combat and overcome the communist menace in their
respective territories. I regret to report that in the joint committee
hearings of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations and National
Defense and Security, none of the defense and foreign officials present
could give any answer to these questions and they confessed to our
amazement and surprise that the detailed plans and objectives of this
projected Greater Malayan Confederation have not been spelled out.
Conclusions
From
the foregoing facts and considerations, I submit to the Senate and to
our people the following conclusions:
(1)
If the administration of President Macapagal seriously believes that
the Philippine claim of sovereignty to a portion of North Borneo should
be prosecuted to the bitter end, it must be prepared to establish the
identity of that portion whether the case is brought before the
International Court of Justice or before the United Nations.
(2)
If the Philippines lose its case, the damage to the honor and prestige
of our Republic would be incalculable. We would appear as having
attempted to colonize a portion of North Borneo without any lawful or
just cause, forgetting our colonialism and our loud demands for
accelerating the grant of self-government or independence to subject
peoples especially those in Asia.
(3)
Even if the Philippines win its case, we stand to gain nothing because
under the United Nations charter, the Bandung Conference declaration
and the 1960 decolonization resolution of the United Nations General
Assembly, we have to give up our rule and administration to the portion
of North Borneo we are claiming, grant its people self-government or
independence and respect their will and wishes as to whether they will
join the Federation of Malaysia or the Greater Malayan Confederation or
exist as a separate independent state. In this connection, it is worthy
of note that judging from press reports of Filipino newspapermen who
had gone to North Borneo, the popular reaction there to our claim of
sovereignty is one of surprise and resentment rather than sympathy and
support.
(4)
If President Macapagal honestly believes that the Federation of
Malaysia plan is not according with the freely expressed will and
wishes of the people of North Borneo, despite the information recently
given by the Mayor of Jesselton while here as an ECAFE delegate that 96
out of 111 representatives elected to the legislative council of North
Borneo last December favor Malaysia, he can raise the question before
the United Nations and ask that a plebiscite be held under the auspices
of the world organization to determine whether the people of North
Borneo really favor Malaysia or not. And if Indonesia insists that the
peoples of Sarawak, Brunei and North Borneo are against Malaysia, we
should point out to her that there is available UN machinery and there
is the peaceful remedy of asking for a plebiscite under the auspices of
the United Nations, which renders unnecessary resort to war or use of
force and violence.
(5)
If President Macapagal honestly believes that his proposed Greater
Malayan Confederation is a better substitute to the Malaysia plan to
defend and protect ourselves and the other Malayan peoples of Asia
against the danger of communist infiltration and subversion, then he
must abandon talking in platitudes and generalities and at once spell
out concretely and specifically, the ways and means, the military and
economic aid if any by which the Greater Malayan Confederation expects
to help the people of North Borneo, Brunei and Sarawak to fight and
overcome successfully the forces of communism once they become
self-governing or independent.
(6)
Our people must be told and made to realize that if we are to be
consistent with our avowed policy of opposing communism firmly and
uncompromisingly, then for the peace and security not only of ourselves
but of our free world allies in Asia, we must see to it that North
Borneo, Brunei and Sarawak, remain on the side of the free would and
not turn communist or neutralist, once they become self-governing or
independent.
(7)
Rather than prosecute the Philippine claim of sovereignty to a portion
of North Borneo to the bitter end. I for one believe in all sincerity
that under the present circumstances, the better course to follow is
for our government to inform the United Nations in due time, i.e., when
the Federation of Malaysia plan is submitted for consideration in the
United Nations that we are voluntarily relinquishing whatever claim of
sovereignty we may have to any portion of North Borneo in order to
accelerate the changing of its status from a non-self governing
territory to that of a self-governing or independent state and that we
favor holding a plebiscite under United Nations auspices to give the
people of North Borneo the opportunity to freely express their will and
wishes as to whether they want to join the Federation of Malaysia or
the Greater Malayan Confederation or exist as a separate independent
state.
SittiKrishnaIdjirami (left) sister of
Jamalul Kiram III (center), the 74-year-old Sultan of Sulu & North
Borneo, and Crown Prince Bantillan Kiram (right) speak at a press
conference in Manila on Tuesday. President Benigno Aquino III has
warned Jamalul Kiram III that he would face the 'full force of the law'
if he did not withdraw his gunmen from Sabah, Malaysia, butthe
elderlyruler remained defiant.AFP/Ted
Aljibe-
During
the interview, Fatima expressed the desire of their followers to be
treated “like other Muslim brothers” and to benefit from the “fruits”
of the land.
“For
how many years, centuries na nga yata, na pinakikinabangan nila itong
lupain na ito, at ang fruit ng aming lupain ay hindi man lang maibahagi
sa tunay na nagmamay-ari,” Fatima said.
Asked
to clarify what she meant by “fruit,” Fatima mentioned that it “doesn't
necessarily mean financial settlement outright.” What it is, according
to her, is having a share in the income of the land.
She
said the annual rent of 5,300 ringgit—or almost P77,000—paid by the
Malaysian government to the Sultanate of Sulu is “not equitable.”
Human
rights violations?
Fatima
also said the right to settle in Sabah by the people of the Sultanate
should be taken into consideration, citing human rights violations that
could have further fueled the outrage of the men over territory issue.
“Pangatlo,
ang karapatan na mag-settle down peacefully ng aming mga tao doon sa
Sabah, Malaysia, na hindi sila ide-deport inhumanely,” she said.
“Maraming
mga karapatang pantao ang nalalabag ng Malaysia in terms of deportation
ng ating mga tao doon na, sa aking opinyon, ito din ang isa sa mga
nag-outrage o nagpabigay init ng ulo sa aming mga tauhan na pumunta
doon sa Sabah na i-declare na ang Sabah ay amin,” she said.
Meanwhile,
asked during the interview regarding current developments among his
followers in Sabah, the Sultan said the men are fine, and that they can
weather factors such as hunger and thirst there.
“Sa
tubig walang problema. Kung 'di sila makakain within three days, four
days, ganun, kaya pa 'yan dahil sanay sila sa fasting,” he said.
Dialogue
He
also said both the Philippine and Malaysian governments have yet to
initiate a dialogue with him.
In
a separate interview on “News to Go,” Foreign Affairs spokesperson Raul
Hernandez said the agency is in constant coordination with the
Malaysian government.
“Patuloy
ang pakikipag-usap ng Pilipinas at Malaysian governments. In fact,
almost everyday, twice or thrice a day, nakikipag-usap si [DFASec.
Albert del Rosario] sa kanyang counterpart, si [Malaysian Foreign
Minister Anifah Aman],” he said. -
Sulu
& Sabah Crown Prince Rajah Muda Kiram: We are not afraid of
Malaysian Army; Sabah is ours
by Kathlyn
dela Cruz,
MANILA -- The Crown Prince of the Sultanate of Sulu on Tuesday
said he and all the members of the royal army are not afraid of
Malaysian security forces despite the threats they have been receiving
due to their refusal to leave Sabah.
Followers of Crown Prince Datu Rajah Muda Agbimuddin Kiram's
brother, Sultan Jamalul Kiram III, have been holed up in Lahad Datu
town for two weeksnowto claim ownership of the
Malaysian territory.
"Mayroon ng pressure sila sa amin pero 'di kami
natatakot...because we believe we are doing right. Ang Sabah na ito ay
owned by the Sultanate of Sulu," Kiram told radio dzMM Tuesday
afternoon.
He saidrental
receiptsfrom the
Malaysian government are proof that the Sultanate of Sulu is the
rightful owner of the land.
Kiram also insisted that they will not leave Sabah despite the
President's appeal for them toreturnto the Philippines.
"If we go home, we will start again from zero about the issue
on Sabah," he said.
He said the royal army is ready to fight Malaysian forces if
needed.
"I have instructed my men to secure the area but we do not
want to...commit war against authorities. But if they will start, yes
[we will fight]. We have to fight for our right...as long as we live,
as long as we are breathing," Kiram said.
No action from PNoy
Kiram said he trusts President Benigno Aquino III but claimed
he has done nothing to bring about a resolution to the long-standing
issue.
"I don't know because there was no action since he became the
President," he said.
"Meron kaming tiwala pero huwag na kaming paalisin dito," he
added.
On Tuesday morning, Aquino said he was not able to read Sultan
Kiram's letter sent through the Office of the Presidential Adviser on
the Peace Process (OPAPP) early in his term because it was buried under
the “bureaucratic maze.”
But Aquino expressed openness to engage Kiram in a dialogue
after Kiram orders his followers to return to the country.
Against the law?
Aquino also said he has ordered an investigation to look into
possible violations committed by the Filipinos engaged in a standoff in
Sabah.
Aquino noted that among the group's possible violations is
Article II Section 2 of the Constitution which states that the
Philippines renounces war as an instrument of national policy.
[http://cms.abs-cbnnews.com/nation/02/26/13/pnoy-kiram-bring-your-followers-home]
However, Kiram claimed they are not doing anything against the
law.
He said some of them went to Sabah with arms so they protect
themselves from "bad elements".
Kiram added that the Philippine government should not express
alarm over the safety of the Filipinos working in Malaysia.
"We came here not to make trouble with anybody or make war
against the authorities because they know that this place is ours. So
we came here to live."
"Bakit ganun? We are not provoking [war]; we came peacefully
to live in our place. Is that against the law?" he asked.
Sultan of Sulu Jamalul Kiram III,
left, joins prayers at the Blue Mosque in Taguig City Friday. AP
MANILA, Philippines—Defense Secretary Voltaire Gazmin said
Friday Malaysia’s continuing payment of lease for Sabah bolsters the
Philippine claim over the territory.
“You see, the sultanate is being paid 5,000 ringgit up to
now,” said Gazmin, referring to the nominal yearly compensation the
heirs to the Sultanate of Sulu receive from Malaysia under a
long-standing agreement.
“So if you are being paid then there’s claim,” he said in a
press briefing.
Dozens of followers of Sultan Jamalul Kiram III sailed over to
neighboring Sabah island more than a week ago to assert their
centuries-old claim over the area.
Also among their demands is additional compensation.
Malaysian authorities surrounded the group, which is believed
to be made up of anywhere between 80 and 400 people, and a stand-off
has since been in place while negotiations continue.
Kuala Lumpur has given the 300 followers of the sultan led by
his brother, Agbimuddin Kiram, until Friday to decide whether to leave
on their own, or be rounded up and deported.
But Gazmin said that while the claims of royal family could be
valid, it is not right to send an armed group to Sabah to reclaim their
territory.
President Benigno Aquino in his first public comments on the
issue Thursday said: “Going there with arms is not the way to resolve
this.”
“When you brandish arms, naturally the
other side has only one way to respond to such a challenge,” said
Aquino.
But Gazmin said Manila is still studying
the Philippines’ dormant claims to Sabah.
At the same time, Gazmin said that he
and his Malaysian counterpart Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi have agreed
to settle the situation “amicably, peacefully, without any violence
whatsoever.”
“We’re trying to prevent that, as much
as possible,” he said. “The Malaysians have been very cooperative.”
The Islamic Sultanate of Sulu once
controlled parts of Borneo, including the site of the stand-off, as
well as southern Philippine islands.
The sultanate leased northern Borneo to
Europeans in the 1870s. While the sultanate’s authority gradually faded
as Western colonial powers exerted their influence over the region, it
continued to receive lease payments for Sabah.
Estimates of the number of the armed men
has varied. Last week, Malaysian Home Minister Hishammuddin Hussein put
the number at between 80 to 100 gunmen.
But the sultan’s spokesman, Abraham
Idjirani, said in Manila there were about 400 members of the group,
including 20 with arms.
Idjirani said Kiram, who lives in a
Manila suburb, gave the men the authority to reside in Sabah and they
were determined to resist efforts to expel them.
The sultan’s men in Sabah were
instructed not to fire first, Idjirani added.
“But if the Malaysian military will attack us, we will be left with no
choice but to defend ourselves,” he quoted Kiram as saying.
Build a house
In the same television report, Torres said the Royal Army
plans to build a house in northern Borneo, where it has been holed up
for about two weeks now.
“Hindi na raw aalis doon sina Rajah Mudah Agbimuddin Kiram,
magtatayo na raw sila doon ng bahay,” Torres said in her report.
According to a previous report of Agence France-Presse, the
armed group led by Sultan of Sulu Rajah Mudah Agbimuddin Kiram arrived
in the coastal town of Kampung Tanduo in Sabah last February 9
supposedly to reclaim their ancestral homeland.
The Sultanate of Sulu, which the elder and younger Kiram
were both heirs, leased northern Borneo to Europeans back in the 1870s.
They still receive yearly compensation from the Malaysian government
under an age-old agreement.
One of the demands of the Filipinos there is more
compensation, an Agence France-Presse report said.
Still, the elder Kiram reiterated its call for a peaceful
resolution in the territorial claim in Sabah, the television report
said.
The Sultanate of Sulu and North Borneo,
now headed by Jamalul Kiram
III, who can trace his lineage at least 500 years back (the sultanate
was founded in 1465)—how many Filipinos can go back that far?—still
strikes me as a tragic institution, the victim of greed, opportunism,
and indifference particularly during the second half of its history.
Only consider: There was Spain, which forced it to accept Spain’s
sovereignty over “Jolo and its dependencies,” then turned around and
ceded North Borneo (which was not a dependency of Jolo but had been
awarded to the sultanate by the Sultan of Brunei in 1685 in gratitude
for the former’s help in quelling a 10-year rebellion that had
devastated Brunei) to Britain under the so-called Madrid Protocol
among Spain, Britain and Germany. It must be pointed out that Spain
did the same thing to the Philippines: It ceded us to the United
States even if we were no longer the former colonizer’s to cede.
Then there was Britain, which first declared in 1883 that it assumed
no sovereignty over Borneo, but then five years later made a
protectorate of North Borneo, and finally in 1946 (10 days after
Philippine independence, mind you), annexed North Borneo as part of
the British Dominions, in spite of formal reminders in the interim by
the US government that Sabah (the other name of North Borneo) was not
Britain’s, but belonged to the Sultanate of Sulu.
And then, of course, there is Malaysia, which, 135 years after the
Sultanate of Sulu leased North Borneo to a private British company
(later known as the British North Borneo Co.), is still paying the
sultanate essentially the same rent as in the original agreement
(later slightly modified because of additional territory). Last year,
for example, the Sultan received a little over P200,000 as lease
payments for the whole of Sabah.
Sabah’s land area is over 73,000 square kilometers. Do the arithmetic:
The Sultanate of Sulu is paid something like P2.74 per square
kilometer in rent. For the Reader’s delectation, one square kilometer
is equal to one million square meters.
The only President who made serious attempts to claim Sabah, it seems,
was President Diosdado Macapagal. And with him we can begin to
identify the good guys who appeared in the odyssey of the Sultanate of
Sulu.
The United States must take a bow as one of the good guys. As
mentioned above, it gave formal reminders to Britain that Sabah
belonged to the Sultanate of Sulu, and it was an American, former
governor general Francis Harrison, who denounced Britain’s act of
annexing North Borneo 10 days after the Philippines gained its
independence, as an act of “political aggression.”
But it was not until 1962 that the Philippines (under Diosdado
Macapagal) tried to flex its muscles, with Indonesia an ally
(Indonesia wasn’t too keen either on North Borneo being part of the
Malaysian Federation, seeing as almost the rest of Borneo is part of
Indonesia). And here another good guy must be identified:
journalist
Napoleon Rama, whose series of articles in the Philippines Free Press
titled “North Borneo Belongs to Us” raised an uproar and galvanized
public opinion.
This eagerness to please is particularly puzzling, because Malaysia
has been, if anything, rather arrogant insofar as the Philippines is
concerned. One remembers that 1,200 Filipino domestic helpers were
rounded up in a Catholic church in Malaysia as they were attending
Mass. But never mind religious sensibilities. What about its arrogance
with regard to the peace talks, trying to tell us what to do or what
not to do? Or, the latest, its refusal to turn over Aman Futures’
Manuel Amalilio?
Is some self-respect on our part too much to ask?
********************
Email us YamashitaTreasures@gmail.com
Solaire Casino Restaurant in PARANAQUE - Vegas of Asia
Solaire
Casino Restaurant in PARANAQUE - Vegas of Asia
Solaire
Casino Restaurant in PARANAQUE - Vegas of Asia
Solaire
Casino Restaurant in PARANAQUE - Vegas of Asia
For example, 95 percent of the ingredients for Solaire’s
Casino Restaurant signature Japanese restaurant, "Yakumi" are
flown in from nowhere else but Tokyo’s Tsukiji market.
“The Solaire chef goes there, the market in Japan, to buy
fish, ingredients three times a week,” Fischer said.
A diner can also pick from a large selection of sake
managed by a sommelier to complement raw fish and skewers from Yakumi’s
sushi and robatayaki counters.
Sommeliers were also brought in to steward a fine selection
of wines and aid in wine and food pairing for customers of the
resort-casino’s other signature restaurants.
TOP 5 BORACAYS
Boracays
is very famous because of their white sand beach which is their sands
is very glassy-smooth. This island of Boracays is very tourist friendly
in fact they developed and improved their facilities for more tourist
to come. If you are seeking to relax and enjoy in one place Boracay is
the place to be, because they have very nice hotels just around the
beach, and if your looking for water adventures they can give it to you
just name it and you got it. Some people say that if you are a tourist
that came from other country and you did not go to Boracay you missed
the half of your life.
PALAWAN
TOP 1 PALAWAN
My Top 1 tourist destination in the Philippines is "PALAWAN".
Lets just simplify Palawan all the tourist spot that i mentioned just
put it in one place and were going to call it Palawan. Maybe I can say
Palawan is the most beautiful place in the Philippines in fact just
recently "Underground River" in Palawan was named as one of the newest
7 woders of the world. Did i make it simple? hehehe. I'm sure if you
will go to Palawan you will know why this is my TOP 1 tourist
destination in the Philippines.
Tubbataha
- Tubbataha Reef is nominated as one of the New 7 Wonders of
Nature. This place is a marine sanctuary. You can find this
place in Sulu Sea, southeast of Puerto Princesa City in Palawan
Province.
#9 Siargao Island, Philippines
Surfing capital in the Philippines
& Game Fishing Capital of the Philippine
Siargao is a tear-drop shaped island situated 800 kilometers southeast
of Manila. It has a land mass of approximately 437 kilometers. The east
coast is relatively straight with one deep inlet-Port Pilar with a
coastline marked by a succession of reefs, small points and white sandy
beaches. There are similar neighboring islands and islets with similar
landforms. The reefs and points are excellent for picking up any swell
that comes along turning into clean, fast waves. The best known surfing
break now with a world reputation of being in the top Surfing Waves in
the world, is nick-named "Cloud Nine". But there are literally scores
of breaks down this coast, and everytime a surfing expedition is
mounted in the area, more new breaks are being discovered.
Korean tourists continue to
enjoy
the wonders of the Philippines
Koreans
remain as the country’s top tourists as Philippine tourism received an
18 percent growth in tourist arrivals from January-June this year.
According to the Department of Tourism (DoT), the
statistics
from
the first half of the year are better compared than last year. Korean
tourists’ fondness for the country’s natural wonders continues to be
the main reason why they continue to rank as our top tourist market.
The overall number of Korean tourists comprised at least one-fourth of
the overall number of visitor arrivals in the country.
The charms of the country’s idyllic beaches from Boracay -
, and
Palawan - continue to lure in Korean tourists into
the country especially
with the boom of destination weddings in various parts of the country.
A delightful surprise from the latest report from the DoT
is
the
United States. Tourists from the US came in close second to Korean
tourists, contributing 317,181 or 19 percent to the total number of
tourist arrivals from January-February, or at least 10,000 more
American tourists.
The high placement of tourists from the United States is
widely
attributed to the numerous adventure destinations in the country.
Adventure destinations such as Cam Sur’s Water Sports Complex (CWC)
Caramoan.COM
continue to receive large number of tourists including Americans. On
the other hand, surfing destinations such as La Union and
Siargao have
been luring Americans into the country by hosting international surfing
events. International events for surfing, wake boarding and other water
sports are now being held in the country and patronized by surfers from
all over the world.
The number of Chinese tourists, on the other hand, had
almost
doubled with a 75 percent increase from 8,366 last year to 14,633 this
year. The influx of Hong Kong tourists also increased by 50 percent
this year from January-June but this is expected to dwindle a bit as an
after-effect of the August 23 hostage incident.
The DoT remains confident that the country’s tourism will
bounce
back from the incident as it continues to look for more ways to widen
its market. After all, the Philippines is one of the few countries in
the world that have been able to flourish amidst global economic
crisis, especially in terms of tourism.
Japan ranks third in the country’s top markets in terms of
volume
with 171,655 tourists, while China, Hong Kong, Australia, Taiwan,
Singapore, Canada, and United Kingdom complete the top markets.
*********
Philippines, Sandakan,Sabah regions sign Barter Trading deal
Shirley Escalante, Manila
A new barter system is ready to to start operating between the
Autonomous Region of Muslim Mindanao in the southern Philippines and
Sandakan, Sabah North Borneo.
A trading arrangement has been signed by officials from both regions.
Officials of the Philippines' Autonomous Muslim Mindanao Region say the
barter enterprise with Sandakan businessmen will offer mostly
Philippine agricultural products to Malaysia.
Sea products from the southern provinces of Sulu, Basilan and Tawi-Tawi
would also be offered to Malaysia.
Inland provinces like Maguindanao and Lanao del Sur will explore other
products which they could offer to Sandakan.
Rosslani Sinarimbo of the Autonomous Muslim Mindanao Region Economic
Zone says the revival of the centuries-old barter among Asian neighbors
would re-open the Polloc Port in Maguindanao province which has been
declared a free port.
********************
Filipinos upstage Malaysians
FILIPINO golfers outshone their Malay-sian rivals at the
100Plus Malaysian Junior Open golf tournament which ended at the Nexus
Golf Resort Karambunai in Kota Kinabalu.
They bagged five of the eight titles at stake and
completely
dominated the tournament.
The boys won three titles including the boys overall,
Under-18
and Under-16 individual titles while the girls won the Under-16 title
and also the overall girls title during the event recently.
The overall titles in both the boys and girls categories
were
won by the respective Under-16 champions whose final scores were the
best of the lot.
******************
Dancing Tax Collection Staff to Bring
more
Willing & Happy Smiling Tax Paying Filipinos - If it brings
in the Philippines Cebu Tax Revenues...
Ofelia Oliva (in pink), the Cebu city treasurer, along with her staff
perform at the city hall in this photo taken last Wednesday. In the
land of dancing prisoners and airline cabin crews, tax collectors have
also caught the toe-tapping bug. Hundreds of people now queue to pay
their taxes in Cebu with the added incentive of watching the staff
shake their hips. -- AFP
**************************
Puerto Princesa, the capital of Palawan island
(Palawan.com) in the southwest of
the Philippine archipelago, is developing as a second flagship city for
the
planned e-transport revolution.
Puerto Princesa authorities are aiming to introduce an
e-jeepney
fleet, but their major ambition is to replace the city's 4,000
gasoline-powered tricycles with electric "e-trikes", Constantino said.
A big next step for Puerto Princesa and Makati is to build biogas
plants to power the e-vehicles with organic waste from local markets
and households, rather than using fossil-fuel derived electricity as is
currently the case. Puerto Princesa began construction of a
one-megawatt biogas plant,
costing US$ 2.4 million dollars, in February 2010 to fuel its
electric public
transport fleet.
******************
Pair ready Palawan bit
Philippines state-owned PNOC and
Australian
junior Nido Petroleum will start drilling in Service Contract 63 off
south-west Palawan next year.
Nido said they expect to complete the seismic date
interpretation and locate drilling sites early next year.
“Nido is also working closely with PNOC-EC to plan for the
drilling of
a well in this block,” Nido said in a statement.
Nido said they have commissioned UK-based geology firm
Midland
Valley
to help interpret the subsurface structure of the block, which is
located in a 10,560 square kilometer area offshore Palawan.
SC63 was awarded to PNOC, which acts as the field’s
operator,
and Nido
through the Philippine Energy Contracting Round in 2006. Both companies
have an equal 50% stake in the block.
In October last year, the group acquired the 754 square
kilometer
Kawayan 3D seismic survey, covering the area around the Aboabo A1-X gas
discovery made by Phillips Petroleum in 1981.
The well was reported to have flowed gas at an estimated
rate
of 50
million cubic feet per day on test.
PNOC has earlier reported that initial seismic
interpretation
identified several prospects and leads in the licence.
The company, however, indicated it would likely tap
additional
partners
by selling a portion of its shares to help fund the block’s
development.
“We’re still talking especially with potential partners on
the
percentage (of the farm-in agreement) especially who will be the
operator,” PNOC-EC vice president Leocadio Ostrea said in an earlier
interview, reported local media.
*************************
Gindara may be as huge as Malampaya'
Australia’s Nido Petroleum said the
Gindara
prospect in the Palawan Islands Service Contract 54B could be as large
as Shell’s producing Malampaya field.
Gindara holds an estimated 634 million barrels of Palawan
oil
in place, up from the previous 470 million barrels, Nido said.
The exploration prospect hold an unrisked upside of about 1
billion
barrels.
Nido released the new estimate after assessing the 3D
seismic
reprocessed by CGGVeritas.
Gindara covers 28 square kilometres in 340 metres of water,
Nido said.
The large oil prospect lies close to Nido’s Yakal and Tindalo
discoveries in SC54B.
Tindalo is slated to begin production in the first quarter
of
2010.
Nido and compatriot Kairki Energy hold 60% and 40%
interests
in SC54B,
respectively.
**********************
PALAWAN FISHY
A fisherman arranges big fishes at the port of Puerto Princesa
in
Palawan Islands (PALAWAN.COM) before transporting them to the market
where they are sold at P300 to P500 per piece
**********************
Tontite, a Pomeranian dressed as "Zorro",
the Spanish masked swordsman in the movie "The Mask of Zorro", models
its costume during the "Scaredy Cats and Dogs" Halloween fund-raising
event at a mall in Quezon City Philippines October 23, 2010.
(Xinhua/Reuters Photo)
Poypoy, an Aspin dog
dressed in a clown costume, performs with his owner during the "Scaredy
Cats and Dogs" Halloween fund-raising event at a mall in Quezon City
Philippines October 23, 2010. (Xinhua/Reuters Photo)
Truffles, a Dutch hound, is
carried by her owner as they model their costumes during the "Scaredy
Cats and Dogs" Halloween fund-raising event at a mall in Quezon City
October 23, 2010. Some 70 pets participated in the event to raise funds
for the Philippine Animal Welfare Society (PAWS)'s Animal
Rehabilitation Center, a temporary shelter for more than 100 dogs and
cats which were either abandoned or rescued from cruelty or neglect.
(Xinhua/Reuters Photo)
Sabah in her lens
SWEDISH photographer Maria Espeus’ black
and
white expressions of the dramatic Sabah rainforest are scattered
throughout GTower.
GTower
developer, Goldis Bhd’s executive chairman Tan Lei Cheng had chanced
upon some work that Espeus did on the Philippines and commissioned her
to produce a collection for the tower.
The result of two months
of work is over 3,000 black and white images of mostly misty panoramas
of Sabah’s forests and dramatic valleys and close-ups of the luxuriant
flora, such as orchids, foliage, and the intricate tangle of root
systems.
“When I arrived in Sabah, I didn’t have the slightest idea
of
how its reality was going to overwhelm me,” recalls Espeus (pic,
left) in an e-mail interview.
“I
didn’t know much about Malaysia before coming here. All the information
I had gathered in preparation for the trip was nothing more than an
attempt to grasp something ineffable that I sensed and which resonated
inside me.”
From Kota Kinabalu, Espeus travelled to Tambunan and
Tenom along with an assistant and a guide (a New Zealander, strangely
enough). The team later returned to Kota Kinabalu to continue on to the
Kinabalu mountains, Poring Hot Springs, Kundasang, Sandakan, Danau
Girang and finally the Danum Valley, famed for its rich biodiversity.
“I
was fascinated by the variety of flora, especially the orchids,” says
Espeus, explaining why many of her pictures highlight the delicate
beauty of these blooms.
“My objective at first was to make an
inventory of the plant life in Sabah, but that is a task beyond my
scope, I realised. So I tried to sum up the spirit and the magic of
that nature by using one part, perhaps a flower, a leaf or a root, to
represent the whole.
A lovely
study of a wild orchid.
“My
fascination with and amazement at my surroundings made me forget any
adaptation problems,” she says when asked how she coped with the
sweltering heat and humidity of Sabah’s forests.
“Photography is
my way of expressing my emotions. However, I am not trying to capture
anecdotes or freeze time. I don’t want to reproduce reality nor do I
aspire to be objective. I am more attracted to the possibility of
transmuting that reality into another subjective reality, one that is
more typical of poetic language.”
Espeus began her professional
career in Sweden but soon began working internationally, publishing
works in prestigious titles such as The New York Times, Vogue,
La Vanguardia and Time magazine. She has also
directed documentaries, advertisements and films, and won a Silver Lion
in Cannes 2002 for the film Origenes: Ano Internacional Gaudi.
She
has photographed many fashion spreads and celebrities, among them, Lord
Andrew Lloyd Webber, Placido Domingo, Ryuichi Sakamoto, Antonio
Banderas, Juan Antonio Samaranch and Montserrat Caballe
Paragliding Offers Good Potentials To Woo
Tourists To Sandakan
SANDAKAN, -- Paragliding sport has the
potentials to be included into the tourism packages in the district in
line with efforts to attract more tourists here.
There are two locations in the district where the Para gliders can be
launched namely in Bukit Trig and Bukit Sim-Sim near the Sandakan town.
State Assemblyman for Elopura Aum Kam Wah said the two locations had
already been used at the Fourth Circuit of the Paragliding Competition
last month where 32 participants had taken part for selection to
compete in the SEA Games in Jakarta next year.
He said both launching sites for the Para gliders were suitable
locations because of the wind speed there as well as the scenic beauty
of the area.
"Paragliding sport has been included into the tourism packages abroad
such as in New Zealand and we find that there are also potentials for
the sport to be included in the existing tour packages in this
district," he told Bernama, here.
****************************************
Facebooking from the Pacific to Palawan
The power of word of mouth is multiplied exponentially
on
the Internet.
Roz Savage and Vince Perez at the Big Lagoon in El Nido
When Vince Perez, chairman of El Nido Resorts, read about
Roz
Savage’s
amazing feat of rowing solo across the Pacific Ocean on the Web, he was
compelled to share it on Facebook.
It turned out that one of his Facebook friends, a fellow World Wildlife
Fund board member in Washington, DC, knew Ms. Savage. With that link
established, Mr. Perez was able to invite Ms. Savage to see what an
ecotourism resort like El Nido is about.
"I also wanted to give her an opportunity to see the Philippines and
share her environmental message," said Mr. Perez
The story of Ms. Savage is remarkable. Ten years ago, at the age of 33,
she was a project manager at an investment enjoying the "perfect" life:
job, husband and a little red sports car.
She decided to give that up to live like the people she admired.
"They were the adventurers and risk-takers, the people who seemed to
have lived many lifetimes in one, the people who had tried lots of
things, some of them successes, some of them spectacular failures but
at least they’d had the guts to try," she wrote.
"They didn’t give a damn what anybody thought of them; their own
opinion of themselves was all that mattered. They lived life with a
greediness for new experiences, gumption and a gung-ho attitude that
defied the attempts of naysayers and nigglers to pigeonhole them or put
them down. These people really knew how to live."
And that is how, in 2006, at the age of 38, Ms. Savage found herself
"divorced, homeless and alone in a tiny rowing boat in the middle of
the Atlantic Ocean."
Two years after her epic crossing, she became the first woman in
history to row solo from California to Hawaii, a record she set en
route to rowing solo across the Pacific Ocean.
By this time, Ms. Savage had amassed an Internet following, an
international audience that followed her progress through her blog
posts.
Her quest for self-fulfillment also evolved into environmental
advocacy.
Ms. Savage is a United Nations Climate Hero, a trained presenter for
the Climate Project and an athlete ambassador for 350.org (an
international campaign that takes its name from what scientists say is
the safe upper limit for carbon dioxide in the atmosphere).
Her Pacific row was a project of the Blue Frontier Campaign and she is
an ambassador for the Blue Project, a community of active enthusiasts
who harness the popularity of adventure sports to showcase the natural
environment.
Through the magic of the Facebook, Mr. Perez, who also chairs
WWF-Philippines, was able to invite the British rower to El Nido and
introduce her to the award-winning eco-resort that adheres to its
G.R.E.E.N. (Guard, Respect, Educate El Nido) principle.
Ms. Savage accepted his invitation. She visited Palawan in July and
blogged about her stay. "El Nido is one of the most beautiful places I
have ever been to," she wrote.
Several paragraphs later Ms. Savage describes her kayaking experience
at Big Lagoon: "It was like stepping back in time to a primordial peace
and quiet. A shallow lagoon, with corals clearly visible beneath the
calm, clear waters. Steep limestone cliffs on every side. Tropical
trees and shrubs clinging onto roots in unfeasibly tiny nooks and
crannies.
"I closed my eyes for a few minutes and felt the slight rocking of the
kayak beneath me, and listened to bird song echoing around the acoustic
chamber of the cliffs. With no significant stretch of the imagination I
could feel myself in a dugout canoe, several thousand years ago."
Mr. Perez was only too happy to share the link on Facebook.
Recognition
at
last for Sabah's resistance war heroes
by Steve Meacham
Chin Piang Syn was an unlikely looking war hero. Though 21
in
1943, he looked much younger.
Australians in the infamous Sandakan POW camp in Sabah believed
''Sini'' (as they nicknamed him) was about 15.
Fortunately,
so did the Japanese invaders who let Sini pedal around the local
airfield distributing tools to local workers - not realising he spoke
fluent English, Malay and Chinese and was a vital messenger between
Australian prisoners and the local underground.
''He took huge risks for months, helping the
Australians and smuggling arms,'' says historian Lynette Ramsay Silver.
''One of the Australian officers, Captain Ken Mosher, once asked him,
'Sini, do you know what will happen to you if the Japanese catch you?'
''Sini replied, 'Yes, they will execute me. But I must do
my
duty. I am a member of the British empire and also a Boy Scout.'''
He
was eventually caught and suffered months of torture by the Japanese.
But he survived the war and was awarded the King's Medal. He died in
2009.
The Governor-General, Quentin Bryce, will
conduct a dawn ceremony tomorrow at Sandakan Memorial Park - on the
site of the former POW camp - to mark the 65th anniversary of Sabah's
liberation from the Japanese.
Ms Bryce will later launch Silver's new book, Blood
Brothers, which, for the first time, focuses on the heroism locals
like Sini displayed against the Japanese.
''We've sadly neglected their stories,'' says Silver, whose
1998 history Sandakan - A Conspiracy of Silence
told how 3000 Australian and British POWs perished in prison camps in
Borneo and on the death marches in the final months of World War II.
''The
local story has been overwhelmed by what happened to the POWs. Yet the
local people hid escaped Australian prisoners, they assisted them at
camp. Many were tortured.
''As the Allies were
bombing the town, the Japanese became convinced the local people who
spoke English were in cahoots. On May 27, 1945, they took every single
person they could find who spoke English - 29 prominent citizens - and
executed them.''
Her book, published initially in Malaysia, was suggested by
the Office of Australian War Graves.
''These
unsung heroes risked and sacrificed their lives to extend the hand of
friendship to total strangers,'' Silver says. ''They laid the
foundations for a lasting and very special relationship between Sabah
and Australia.''
PALAWAN MASSACRE
Again, another POW story
This from my old friend, Ray Thompson Bataan survivor until 1999.
SUBJECT: PALAWAN-MEMOIRS
FROM: FVWW66A RAY THOMPSON
Palawan Memoirs of Ernest J. Koblos, who survived the Massacre when 139
POWs burned.
Ernest gave this account of the massacre to the press on Aug 28, 1944.
He was one of 11, WW II survivors who by law of averages should not be
enjoying the freedom and pleasures of their homeland, the love of home
and family. For Koblos, who formerly lived in Chicago, and his ten
living buddies, are the sole survivors of the infamous Palawan massacre
in which 139 out of a total of 150 American POWs were executed in one
of the most dastardly deeds ever to be conceived in the minds of
so-called civilized men, according to a special dispatch to the Daily
Calumet (a Chicago Paper), from General Hdqs. of the Supreme Commander
for the Allied Powers (SCAP) in Tokyo, Japan.
As if being watched over by some omnipotent power, these boys reached
safety in probably the most miraculous and spectacular escape yet
recorded in the history of WW II. Sixteen Japanese who are charged with
the responsibility for the massacre will face a Yokohama 8th Army
Military commission this month.
Alva C. Carpenter, Chief of SCAP's legal section, first learned of this
new
addition to the already overflowing volume of Pacific war crimes while
serving with the American forces that re-occupied Mindoro in the
Philippines. He knew that it was a major atrocity, that justice and
America demanded that the perpetrators be found and made to answer for
this diabolical crime,and so, during the past three years he has
concentrated his every effort on bringing to the bar of just ice those
responsible for the Palawan massacre. In a recent interview Carpenter
declared "at the close of the Pacific war I pledged myself to fulfill
the solemn promises made to the people of the United States and the
Allied Nations at Potsdam that stern justice shall be meted out to all
war criminals, especially those who have visited cruelties upon our
POWS".
To me these were no idle words spoken to appease outraged peoples; they
were a mandate which I determined to thoroughly discharge and three
years of investigative research have expended to this end".
ONLY 11 American ESCAPED
Just two months prior to the occupation of Palawan Island by the
American
troops the mass destruction of American POWs had been perpetrated--with
the exception of the 11 escapees, a complete POW camp had been
"annihilated" when it became evident that the victorious forces would
make a landing in the vicinity of Palawan, possibly on the island
itself. Conceived in hate and born in an atmosphere of frustration, the
decision to kill the American prisoners was no instantaneous burst of
passion. It was a fulfillment of a premeditated plan to "DISPOSE" of
the gallant defenders of Bataan and Corregidor at the time of the enemy
landing. The method of disposition was the off-spring of moral
depravity unsurpassed in the annals of Pacific war crimes...the
individual acts of heroism displayed by the few survivors are unequaled.
HOPE: B-24s SHOW
In October 1944,there were remaining at Puerta Princesa POW camp at
Palawan Island in the Philippine Islands P.I., 150 American POWs.
They had been sent there
by the Japanese to build an airstrip--a military project designed to
further the Japanese war effort against the Allied Forces. Conditions
at this camp were similar to those existing in most Japanese POW
camps--too little of every necessity of life, too much of mistreatment,
abuse and manual labor. All the hardships that had been suffered during
two years and a half were of little consequence, however, to these
prisoners on 19 Oct, 1944.
They could not forget the past, but the future looked brighter as they
watched the first B-24 that they had ever seen raid the airstrip they
had laboriously built, for the most part with hand tools, during long,
arduous hours in the relentless tropical sun.
It was easy for them to be lighthearted now--it would only be a matter
of a short time before they would be liberated, and, as their morale
soared, so that of the Japanese forces dropped to a new low. From now
on, daily air raids became a part of "living" at Puerta Princesa, and
so it was not unusual to hear the air raid siren at noon on 15 Dec.
1944.
What was unusual, however, was the fact that the Japanese called all the
Americans back to the compound from the airfield on which they were
still
working, filling in bomb craters now, when heretofore their captors had
shown no concern for the prisoners' safety, compelling them to work on
the strip even during actual raids. "We knew something was the matter
but couldn't figure out what", stated Koblos.
PRISONERS CORRALLED
There were inside the POW compound, three large air raid shelters,
having a narrow entrance at each and a cover over the top. The Japanese
specifications had permitted only one entrance but after much
persuasion the Americans were allowed to make two entrances. These
shelter would accommodate, very uncomfortably, approximately 40--50 men
each, and in addition there were several small shelters with a capacity
of from one to four men each. The area was completely surrounded by a
double barb-wired fence and the camp was built on a cliff overlooking
the Puerta Princesa Bay.
On this fateful day of 14 Dec. l944, the Japanese herded every prisoner
into these shelters, saying that there were "hundreds" of American
planes coming. The only evidence of an air raid was a lone Japanese sea
plane which circled the camp area and the field a few times as if in
response to the call of the false air raid alarm for some showing. Many
of the boys were hesitant to go into the shelters--these were "helped"
by prodding with bayonets and threats of being killed if they did not
obey the orders to go underground. No sooner was the last man "safely"
hidden from the dangers of an American air raid then two companies of
Japanese soldiers, armed with buckets of gasoline,torches, rifles,
machine guns, fixed bayonets and hand grenades, entered the compound
and proceeded to carry into effect the plan for the annihilation of
every single POW.
IGNITE GASOLINE
The bestial savagery of the perpetrators was unleashed as the assault
began, running, screaming and laughing, they attacked each shelter,
wherein the unsuspecting and helpless prisoners were trapped throwing
in buckets of gasoline and igniting it with torches. Some of the men
did manage to get out of the raging infernos only to be beheaded,
bayoneted, clubbed to death, shot with rifles or dropped by machine gun
fire. In some cases men were slowly tortured with bayonets, then
gasoline was poured on first one foot and then the other, ignited, and
their whole bodies set aflame. Some few were able to escape into the
water by tearing barehanded through the barb-wire fences and jumping
down a 50-foot cliff only to be drowned in the water when they were
shot at either from the shore or from a small boat that patrolled the
foreshores of the bay watching out for escapees. Men walking walls of
flame, ran out of the shelters begging for mercy and for the Japanese
"to use some sense" only to be shot down...others, knowing fully their
fate, grabbed onto Japanese guards causing them to burn up together.
Still others, bodies afire, grappled with their assailants, and were
able to
wrest a bayonet from one or two of the Japanese and kill them before
they
themselves were bayoneted to death from behind.
The 11 prisoners who succeeded in escaping found temporary refuge in
the caves on the beach. It was not long, however, before roving parties
of Japanese began scanning every nook and corner for possible
survivors--the plan being to kill every single American and so forever
hide the truth of this murderous crime. Several times during the
ensuing four or five hours it seemed inevitable that the hiding places
of this small band would be discovered, but somehow, thorough as the
search was, they were overlooked. Their ordeal was not over, however.
Possibly they would find help and safety if they could reach the
opposite side of the bay--a distance of about five miles through
shark-infested waters, and two or three of the men could not swim...but
it was their only chance and they all took it. After dark that same
evening some of the escapees began to swim across--10 days later the
last one to reach the opposite side was found caught in a fish trap by
friendly Filipinos coming out in the early morning to gather in the
previous night's catch! They escorted him, as they had done the others,
to Brooke's Point where an American PBY (a US made two engine Amphibian
seaplane) evacuated them to the American lines.
All that remained of the 139 victims when the American forces landed
were
incomplete skeletons, scattered at random in the area of the camp,
piles of
bones in the air raid shelters, dog-tags and other identifying
data--mute
evidence of the sordid gruesomeness, the bestial depravity of the
perpetrators and sponsors of this outrageous crime.
During the past three years a staff of investigators have been tireless
in
their efforts to find those Japanese responsible for this atrocity. The
entire islands of Japan and the Philippines have been combed and
hundreds of interrogations conducted, as a result of which 16 Japanese
ranging in rank from former Lt. Generals to a Private First Class will
face a military commission in Yokohama to be judged for their part in
this planned and premeditated execution of innocent and helpless
American prisoners of war. "Unfortunately", stated Carpenter, "most of
the actual participants in this crime have never been captured despite
a maximum of effort to locate them, and there is every reason to
believe they were killed when Palawan island was taken by the American
forces. However, we do have those people who, by their acts of
commission or omission or both, allowed this heinous crime to be
perpetrated and we are determined that they shall answer for their
actions before the bar of justice".
This story published with permission from IRENE KOBLOS, the widow of Sgt
Koblos, who died 1990, he enlisted in the Regular Army 1939, served in
the 59th Coast Artillery in the Philippines. He returned home to
US-1945- spent considerable time in Letterman Gen. Hosp. and Garner
Gen. Hosp.in Chicago, as the result of his ordeal in Japanese hands. He
married Irene, August 1945, they have a son John; Irene now resides in
California." End"
Last September the barbed wire of Puerta Princesa prison camp at
Palawan held 150 prisoners of war, the remnants of a "volunteer" labor
battalion brought there from Luzon shortly after the surrender at
Corregidor, to build a Japanese airfield.
The original group of some 300 had volunteered because they thought
anything
would be better than the squalor, disease and death of Cabanatuan
prison camp on Luzon.
Yet, two months later, 141 of the 150 were to be slain in the worst mass
atrocity of the Pacific war.
In a Marine Corps office at San Francisco, twenty-six year old Marine
Corporal Rufus W. Smith of Hughes Springs, Texas, talked slowly and
carefully: "We had been at Puerta Princesa prison camp for a little
over twenty-eight months when the Japanese decided to kill us."
Arriving at the camp, Smith continued, the Americans were herded inside
the barbed wire, bedded down like ill-kept farm animals, and booted
awake by Japanese guards at four thirty the next morning.
Breakfast was one large spoonful of rice-Cambodian rice, wormy and full
of
rocks, which the Japanese serve in prison camps because they don't like
it
themselves. During the next two years the men were to eat it three
times a day, with now and then a dab of a Philippine vegetable--also
wormy--resembling potatoes. Even this planned ration was a starvation
diet designed to keep them too weak to make trouble or to get very far
if they escaped. But the Japanese reduced it even further by thieving
from the supply.
The Americans at Puerta Princesa, being a labor battalion were not to
be killed unnecessarily. But the Japanese were specialized in beating
them with pick handles--"just for nothing, "Smith said, "They'd just
come up jabbering and swinging with their clubs."
At various times in those next twenty-eight months, prisoners tried to
escape. Two Americans who were caught were tied up and thrown into the
brig, where the Japanese took turns beating them. Any Japanese who
cared to could beat them, night or day. Every morning the other
Americans had to pass the cage where they were lying. On July 4, 1944,
the two were finally shot. Japanese prison officials always pointedly
observe our national holidays.
Most of the Americans who did escape managed it by breaking an arm or a
leg, usually by a blow with a shovel. But if the Japanese decided it
was done intentionally, they might leave the man where he fell, or
throw him into a cage and leave him until he died.
Some of the prisoners got away with it, and were treated and shipped
back to Manila. Usually, however, someone was lying in the special cage
with an unset fracture, looking out with the eyes of an animal that has
spent many days in a steel trap.
Every prisoner worked if he possibly could, because if he couldn't get
to his
feet in the morning, his ration was cut at once by 30 per cent--a ball
of rice about the size of an orange.
One morning last September the Japanese loaded all but 150 of the men
on a ship bound back to the prison camp at Luzon.
After the Japanese told the remaining prisoners that the ship had been
torpedoed and all the men lost. Who could contradict them?
Then, about noon last October 19, a lone B-24 raided Puerta Princesa,
Palawan's capitol, sank two ships in the harbor, and strafed the town
and the new airfield. With their hearts rattling against their ribs,
the men looked silently at one another, and smiled when the guards
weren't looking.
Things were going to be all right. After that first one, raids came
almost
daily. And the treatment of the men by their Japanese guards went from
bad to unendurable.
Then they were ordered to build air-raid shelters. First they dug three
roofed trenches, each long enough to hold about fifty men and each with
a small entrance at each end. Smaller shelters were dug for the cooks,
officers, and drivers. Some of the men were allowed t o build
individual shelters; among them was Marine Sergeant Douglas. W. Bogue
of Los Angeles, California, one of the nine who eventually escaped. All
these shelters were inside the prison compound on a high bluff that
jutted out into turbulent shark-filled Puerta Princesa Bay. Outside the
double row of barbed wire a coral cliff slanted fifty feet down to the
water. And when torrential rains washed away part of the trenches,
repairs exposed tunnels that ran under the wire and out to the face of
the cliff. Several men quietly prepared escape hatches as they worked,
concealing their exits on the cliff with coral boulders or a thin
shoring of earth.
Then, on December 13, a Japanese patrol plane over the Sulu Sea sighted
our invasion convoy that landed later on Mindoro Island.
The Japanese thought it was headed for Palawan. "The Japanese guards
aroused us that night with their chattering, " Smith went on, "but they
finally quieted down. At four thirty we hiked off to the airfield to
work as usual." About noon the guards suddenly marched them back to
camp. The Americans kept looking questionably at one another and
shrugging their shoulders. They had never quit work at noon before.
Then the guards started beating on an old church bell they used for an
air-raid alarm., The word passed that hundreds of American planes were
headed for Palawan. The Japanese guards herded the men into the
air-raid shelters.
Sergeant Bogue took up the story. "We had been sitting in the shelters
some thirty minutes," he said,"when two P-38s began circling overhead.
Suddenly fifty or sixty Japanese soldiers with light machine guns,
rifles, and buckets of gasoline ran into the compound." These Japanese
soldiers ran directly to A company's shelter, where there were about
forty Americans. They opened the narrow door, threw in several buckets
of gasoline then tossed in lighted torches.
Massacre on Palawan of 139 POWs, by R. W. Smith.
"All of a sudden," said Marine Corporal Glen W. McDole of Des Moines,
Iowa, "I heard a dull explosion, men screaming, and machine guns. We
were in another hole with our heads down, waiting for the air raid, My
buddy (Smith) yelled, "They're murdering the men in A Company pit!" I
looked out and saw one man run out of A Company's pit in flames., He
was burning like a newspaper. A Japanese machine gunner, stationed on
the porch of the barracks, cut him in two."
The Japanese ran now from shelter to shelter with their buckets of
gasoline and their torches. As the crazed Americans came boiling up out
of the burning shelters, flaming from head to foot like men made of
pitch, other busy, little Japanese machine-gunned them and bayonetted
them., The horrible smell of burning flesh began drifting across the
compound.
Below, in the pits, the few men not actually burning fought to hold on
to their reason and somehow to get out.
Some did get out. Some crawled up into the flaming bullet-spattered
compound itself and clawed their way under the fence to reach and fall
down the cliff face. Navy Chief Radioman Fern J. Barta of San Diego,
California, made it this way.
So did Bogue. "When I came up out of my hole," said Bogue, "it was like
coming up a ladder into hell. Burning Americans were rushing the
Japanese and fighting them hand to hand, I saw one man, burning like a
haystack, grab a rifle a way from a Japanese and shoot him; another
guard bayoneted him from behind."
Maybe fifty or sixty men, maybe more got down the cliff face to the
beach. Many desperate and insentient leaped and tumbled down the cliff,
jumped into the bay and started swimming. They were shot to pieces by
the Japanese machine gunners on the top of the cliff.
The others hid in holes in the rocks,in the sewer outlet, anywhere.
Smith
jumped into a coral crevice next to him to wait for McDole, McDole had
been right on his heels, but now he didn't show up. As Smith watched, a
soldier in the crevice next to him suddenly jumped up and yelled. I'm
going to get my part of this over with, he ran down to the beach dived
into the water and started swimming.
"He was only out about twenty yards," Smith said, "when a bullet hit
him and he rolled over and shouted, they got me. Then he thumbed his
nose to the Japanese on the cliff-and went under."
Smith, still in control of himself, climbed unseen backup the hill and
hid in
the long grass almost touching the prison fence. He thought that would
be the last place the Japanese would look. He hid under a ledge covered
by long overhanging grass. He carefully covered himself with leaves and
dirt. He estimates that this was about one o'clock in the afternoon.
The whole thing had been going on only about thirty minutes.
All of them could hear the Japanese using dynamite on the burned men
who were still alive in the hilltop death trenches When they had
finished, the Japanese scrambled down the cliff with rifles and
bayonets and began combing the rocks and beach, dragging the hidden
Americans out of their holes and murdering them on the spot.
For the men lying panting and desperate in those holes, the afternoon
was
endless and terrible. A man hiding five feet away from you, a six-foot
American you'd been through three years of hell with, would be dragged
out and bayoneted to death by a dozen little yelling Japanese, and you
didn't dare move.
As the endless search went on, a lot of men who might have made it
cracked up. McDole and two others were hiding in a garbage dump,
completely covered by the rotting fly-crusted stuff. As a Japanese
patrol neared the dump, one of the men suddenly jumped up and ran for
the bay.
"The Japanese shot him," said McDole, "Then, when they got within five
meters of us, the second man with me raised up and said,'All right ,
you Japanese b------ds,'here I am and don't miss me. They shot him,
poured gasoline on him and burned his body.
"After the patrol went away, I made a small opening to get some air.
Down the beach I saw six Japanese jabbing a bleeding mud-covered
American with their bayonets. Another Japanese ran up with a bucket and
a torch. The American begged to be shot and not burned. The Japanese
poured gasoline on his hands and feet, and lighted it. Then the man
collapsed."
Smith, hidden in the tall grass up on the cliff, had a dozen narrow
escapes.
Twice searching Japanese grazed his ribs as they jabbed bayonets into
the
grass.
"Once I thought sure I was caught,"said Smith,"A Japanese pulled the
grass away from me and looked straight into my eyes. I felt his breath
panting down on me and smelled that awful Japanese sweat they all stink
of. Cold as death, I waited for the bayonet in my ribs. Three years of
hell--for this! I remember praying that he'd do it right the first
time."
Suddenly the Japanese dropped the grass over Smith and left, he hadn't
seen him. Smith stayed covered until past dark, finally everything got
quiet, and the Japanese guards no longer looked for the escapees. Smith
sneaked to the beach and began the long swim across Puerta Princesa Bay.
Bogue had been hiding in a hole in the rocks till the rising tide
forced him
out of it. Looking for a new hiding place, he found Fern Barta and three
others in the camp's sewer outlet. About nine 0'clock that night these
five
started out to swim the bay. Almost immediately they were swept apart
by the strong tide, and it was ten days before Bogue and Barta met. One
of the five, a Marine private, was never seen again. It was sunrise
when Barta dragged himself up on the far shore of the bay and crawled
into the jungle. McDole, exhausted and sick, lay in the fly-blanketed
garbage dump all night and all the next day. That night he tried to
swim, but the water was so rough he couldn't make it. He crawled back
to the garbage dump, and for another night and day in that mess of
flies and rot, praying for strength. That night he tried it again, and
again he was forced back. The following night he crawled down to the
shore for the third time, fell into the water, and started swimming; he
would get across or drown. All night he swam and floated and swam
again. He came very near dying. His mind had stopped. Like an engine
stalled on dead center.
His arms and legs were no longer even part of him; some strange tired
motor kept them going till finally his hands were clawing suddenly and
miraculously into sand. He was ashore. His head dropped into the sand.
He tried hard to think who he was and what he was supposed to be doing.
Finally, he crawled to the edge of the jungle and hid there all day.
That
night he tried swimming across a little inlet to a Filipino tuberculosis
colony, but he was too far gone. He realized he couldn't swim anymore.
And then in the wet heaving darkness, he bumped into the poles of a
fish trap. He crawled upon it and collapsed, somewhere between sleep
and death. In the morning Filipino fishermen from the Iwahig penal
colony found him there.
They hurried him back to their camp. There he was joined by Bogue, who
had been found by Filipino prisoners from the camp after being lost for
five days in the jungle. Rested and fed, Bogue and McDole were taken to
the leader of the Palawan underground, who gave them horses and a guide
and got them to a point where they were picked up by a Navy sea plane
and flown to Leyte.
At Aborlan, a town held by the guerrillas, a second party of horsemen
caught up with them. One of the riders was Barta He had stumbled into
Iwahig colony after spending ten days and nights in the jungle. Some
other survivors, including Smith, were picked up later and flown to
Moratai.
Up on the cliff some of the Japanese guards were only ten feet away
from Smith. Still, he had to try for a getaway when darkness came.
Slowly he eased out of his hiding place and inched his way down the
cliff, fearing each step that a coral landslide would bring a shower of
jabbering yells and bullets.
Luck was with him, Noiseless as a shadow, he moved steadily down to the
shore and into the water.
He had been in the water about an hour and a half when the little
Japanese patrol boat combing the bay for possible survivors bore down
on him. Its weak yellow light actually waved directly across him from
not more than fifty yards away. But the boat turned and went on.
"I started swimming again," said Smith in his slow tired drawl, "and
had been out about two hours, I guess, when I heard a swirl in the
water off to one side. I glanced around in time to see a six-foot shark
headed for me. He came right on in and bit my right arm.
Somehow--I don't know how--I reached around with my other arm and slung
him loose. Then I kicked and splashed, and I must have scared him off;
he didn't bother me after that."
The Marine Corps public relations officer whispered to Smith; he rolled
up his sleeve. There on his right forearm were the scars from the teeth
of the shark that he'd "slung loose."
After the Shark, Smith swam on for what seemed like years. He turned on
his back for the hundredth time to rest, and made out trees on a
mountain ahead of him. He turned over again and swam till his arms were
strips of leather which somebody kept splashing into the water ahead of
him, and he knew he couldn't swim much longer. He decided to try to hit
bottom. He held his nose and went down hard. The water was only up to
his armpits. Gratefully he started to walk, and that's when he almost
drowned. Because his legs wouldn't hold him. He fell and swallowed the
muddy water and almost drowned. He finally got to his feet and made it
to the beach.
It was still night, and the terrible clouds of Philippine mosquitos
started
swarming over him. If he lay there he'd be eaten alive. He crawled up
to the edge of a mangrove swamp and coated himself, face and all, with
mud. That kept the mosquitoes off. He rested a while, and then plunged
into the swamp.
He was naked, except for the mud. The thick growth clutched his body
with clammy hands. At each step his feet seemed to sink deeper into the
black ooze. He knew the alligators would get him before long. He
climbed a tree and stayed there the rest of the night. Dawn was the
most beautiful thing he had ever seen.
All that day Smith traveled through the jungle. When the growth became
impenetrable he climbed up above it and swung along on the long vines
from tree to tree. Occasionally he'd grip a brier vine; the hard spines
cut like barbed wire. "They cut me up pretty bad," he said.
But he went on, and he made it. Late that afternoon he found the
wonderful compassionate Philippine guerrillas. They gathered up his
skinny, bleeding, muddy body and carried him to their camp. They fed
him and put him to bed. And now he was in San Francisco, on his way
home to Hughes Springs, Texas--the kind of place that can help a man
forget jungles and JAPANESE! This story also furnished by Mrs.Koblos,
who also gave you the account of her husband in Chapters 1 through 4.
In appreciation I'm sending her all ten chapters printed as she among
many does not possess a computer.
TO: ALL DATE: 08/09
FROM: FVWW66A RAY THOMPSON TIME: 2:47 PM
PALAWAN PUSHOVER, Courtesy of Air Force Magazine, 1945.
When the time came to lock the door on Japanese troop
and supply movements in the South China Sea and provide a
springboard for airpower in subsequent Borneo invasions, the
key was the Philippine island of Palawan which points
southward like a finger to the rich East Indies. "I don't
want a single shot fired at the infantry when it goes ashore
at Palawan. "Maj. Gen.Paul B. Wurtsmith, CG of the 13th Air
Force, told his staff. And not a shot was fired. Infantrymen
of the 41st Division went ashore at Puerto Princesa almost
unopposed. No men were lost on D-day. The Japanese had fled
to the hills.
This easy invasion of strategically important Palawan was
accomplished by air attacks that started early in October
1944 when Army and Navy nuisance raiders paid occasional
visits. The tempo was stepped up sharply near the end of the
month when 37 heavies plastered Puerto Princesa airdrome,
destroying 23 parked aircraft and damaging 15 others. The
Japanese garrison never recovered from that raid and the
13th's bombers continued to give the area a once-over-lightly
every time repairmen began filling in the craters.
On November 29, Morotai-based P-38s of the 13th
Fighter Command flew their first escort mission to Puerto
Princesa, but there was no interception, nor was there any
on subsequent missions. The final phase of the softening-up
was staged from Mindoro with both fighters and bombers of
the 5th Air Force blasting the area with bomb and strafing
runs.
A sustained three-day attack preceded the February 28
landing.
The devastated facilities found by infantrymen--buildings,
runways, revetments, aircraft--were convincing proof of the
effectiveness of the pre-invasion attacks. The concrete runway
was spotted with 182 bomb craters. Eighteen other craters had
taken care of the overruns. The bombing results looked good
to everyone but the aviation engineers, who had to put the
strip back into service.
(Comments by Ray Thompson; I wonder what the Commanding
General, the fighter pilots, the bomber pilots, and the
infantrymen, who performed the above acts would have
felt, had they known that American POWs were the slaves
that were filling up these bomb craters after each raid.
We know from other testimony, how shocked military personnel
were when they found the massacred American POWs in the so
called bomb shelters at Palawan airfield;
NOTE- I flew off this runway for several days in the winter of '45. It
was coral based and pretty solid althougth muddy at times.
New Bird Species Found In Heart Of Borneo
“Spectacled
Flowerpecker,” a bird species new to science, has been
discovered in the heart of the Bornean rainforest. However,
the species is so little known that it has yet to be given a
scientific name.
British Student's aim to map Borneo
A FORMER Derbyshire school pupil is heading for
Borneo this summer to try to map uncharted parts of the country as part
of a conservation project.James Rough, who
attended Queen Elizabeth's Grammar School, in Ashbourne, will travel
with 12 UK and four Indonesian students for up to three months from
July.He is currently studying geography with environmental management
at the University of Exeter.Evidence
of rare or endangered species, such as the orangutan or clouded
leopard, will help to ensure that the threatened forest is
protected.James
said: "This once-in-a-lifetime chance will be an amazing adventure
which will also help me further my academic career in a location many
postgraduates and professionals dream of being able to complete
research in."He will travel with FX-Pedition 2010 to the heart of
Borneo's
rainforest to explore the species living in the unexplored mountains
that mark the Joloi and Kapuas watershed.
The
expedition will be run by the students and they will be funding the
trip themselves through grant applications, sponsorship and fundraising
event
Even
MAY BANK "Malaysian Bank" in Philippine also Steal by Not
paying Taxes Properly with Philippine Internal Revenue:
BIR sues Maybank Philippines affiliate with P169.83-M tax evasion case May 3, 2013 6:37pm
The Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) on Friday said it sued before the
Department of Justice an affiliate of Malaysian-controlled Maybank
Philippines Inc. and its officials for P169.83 million in unpaid taxes.
Criminal
charges were also filed against Philmay Property Inc. president Ong
Seet-Joon, treasurer Atty. Rafael Morales, corporate secretary Atty.
Jonathan P. Ong, sales and marketing department head Benjamin Q. Lira
and remedial accounting associate Michelle F. Reyes.
Sought for comment, a Philmay representative told GMA News Online, "We are not in any position to comment on that as of now.
"Higher management will come out with a statement," she added.
According to a BIR computation, Philmay accumulated P169.83 million in tax deficiencies, including surcharge and interest:
Philmay
was among the real estate companies that were allowed to have foreign
equity for a limited period under the country’s Special Purpose Vehicle
Law to help banks unload foreclosed assets after the 1997 Asian
financial crisis.
The BIR said Philmay declared a P50.64–million loss in its annual income tax return for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2009.
In
November 2009, the BIR looked into the books of Philmay. The bureau
said three of its revenue officers initially came up with a tax
assessment of P51.96 million which was somehow trimmed down to
P499,206.53.
The BIR also filed criminal cases against the three revenue officers who first investigated Philmay’s books and records.
The
real estate firm claimed a deductible expense amounting to P3.21
million for the fiscal-year ending June 30, 2009 which represents
salaries and wages. "[It] shouldn’t have claimed it as a deduction as it
failed to withhold any tax on the salaries and wages which should have
been done monthly," BIR said.
The company also claimed
P50.21 million in operating expenses in its income tax return for the
same year that included salaries, allowances, fringe benefits and
interest expenses that were not supported by any document, the BIR
noted.
In addition, Philmay did not report P95.07
million in real estate sales in its value added tax return for the year,
the bureau said, noting the company neither did the company pay the
necessary documentary stamp taxes for the transactions.
The
BIR said it learned that Philmay paid its creditor, Maybank Philippines
Inc. P61.18 million, with interest expenses amounting to P47.6 million
and that the loan was a related party transaction.
Philmay is 39.99 percent owned by Malayan Banking Berhad, that also owns 99.99 percent of Maybank Philippines, the BIR noted.
Filipino-Swiss race car driver Marlon Stockinger will be arriving in
Manila on Wednesday night to attend the Manila Speed Show, where he will
be parading a Lotus Formula 1 race car.
The Manila Speed Show will take place on May 3-5 2013 at the Quirino Grandstand and the Mall of Asia.
The 21-year-old Filipino-Swiss said he is very pleased to present the
car to the Filipino race enthusiasts in tandem with his Lotus F1 team.
Also attending the Manila Speed Show is Lotus F1 team owner Eric Bouillier.
Stockinger was recently chosen by Lotus to become one of its drivers
in its junior team for the Formula Renault World Series 2013.
The series is widely considered as the springboard to Formula 1
Philippine National Food Authority Rice Storage (NFA)
Vietnam's company offered a price of $459.75 per tonne to win the bid.
The Thai government, the only other bidder on the Philippines
contract, offered a price of $568 per tonne for the 25% broken white
rice.
That made the Thai price $108.25 higher than Vietnam's offer - per tonne, or $20.2 million for the order.
The Philippines sale appeared to provide more proof that Thailand is
finding it difficult to impossible to sell rice at a competitive price
because of the high prices it is paying to farmers for paddy.
For the Philippines, it was a one-time importation deal.
National Food Authority (NFA) administrator Orlan Agbin Calayag told
reporters he expects the country to be self-sufficient for the rest of
the year.
3 Malaysians arrested for ‘stealing’ from Philippine ATM
MANILA,
Philippines - Three Malaysians were arrested after they allegedly tried
to take money from an automated teller machine (ATM) with the use of an
illegal device in a mall in Iloilo City on Saturday, police said.
The suspects identified as Ching Seng Jun, 25; Chang Yong Siang, 32;
and Tan Boon Fooi, 24, all temporarily staying at Hotel del Rio in
Iloilo City, were arrested by the security guards of the SM City Mall in
Mandurriao.
Seized from the suspects were a skimming device, double-sided
tape, a pair of scissors, cutter, assorted cards and P10,970 cash.
Unwanted consequences of a North Borneo Sabah Escalation - Part 2
Written by Jose V. Romero
Guerilla Warfare Unwinnable for Malaysians
In Lahad Datu and Semporna Felda
districts in Sabah, the Sultanates’ security forces reinforced by MNLF
veterans, probably trained by Malaysians in the past, used dynamite,
normally used by Tausug fisherman for fishing, to blow up a couple of
armored vehicles of the Malaysian armed forces killing about a dozen of
them. Apparently this was in retaliation for the bombing of the
residence of a Filipino Imam in the area of conflict. Shortly after, the
Malaysian air force dispatched some fighter bombers to bomb the
suspected lairs of the intruders. As expected, there were just a few
reported casualties as the guerillas hid under the shade of the dense
forest and the canopy provided by closely woven palm oil trees and the thick underbrush.
This
is classic guerilla warfare. In this country, this kind of heavy armed
forces response to guerilla attacks has yielded meager and indecisive
results. As more volunteers from the Sulu peninsula arrive to reinforce
their beleaguered brothers in Sabah, a short distance away by motorized
kumpits equipped with Volvo engines which successfully eluded the
Philippine navy’s coastguard cutters in the heyday of smuggling, the low
intensity conflict in Sabah will escalate. If the Philippine Republic
employing a substantial amount of military assets could not subdue
Muslim insurgents in the last half century, it is doubtful if the
Malaysian military which took many years to subdue their homegrown
insurgents during the “emergency” even with the help of the British, can
easily take out the combined forces of Misuari and Kiram.
It is
ironic that if the push comes to a shoving match between the Malaysian
forces and the security forces of the Sultanate and the MNLF, the
Malaysians will be facing armed elements that they trained in the past
to harass the armed forces of the Philippines.
For certain, the
Malaysian forces will be at a strategic disadvantage considering the
proximity of the Sulu archipelago to Sabah. It would be easy for the
sultanate forces to mount a strategic retreat by simply running to their
motorized bancas if cornered by Malaysian forces. This hit-and-run
tactic was precisely what bedeviled Philippine forces when running after
the MNLF who were quick to escape to safe havens in Sabah whenever the
Philippine forces were in hot pursuit after them. Today it will be the
reverse. The long and porous shoreline of Sabah easily allows undetected
beach landings by small bands of invaders.
Now that some blood
has been spilled and Tausugs were slaughtered on the battlefield of
Sabah, a fuse has been lit which, if not stamped out, will spiral out of
control. The cost in lives and material will be substantial. The exodus
from Malaysian Feldas by local and migrant Filipino workers from areas
of conflict will be a drain on the Sabah economy. Moreover, the
political instability will dissuade direct investment in the area as it
has in the case of politically volatile Mindanao.
Malaysia should
learn from the Filipino experience – you cannot tame the Tausugs with
force. This tribe has never been conquered even by superior forces. Not
even the American Colt 45 with its amazing stopping power was able to
tame the Tausugs juramentado. By its aggressive action, Malaysia will
import from the Philippines the Muslim militancy from the southern
Philippines which was caused by centuries of benign neglect from central
authorities and their own corrupt leadership.
The bottom line is to immediately de-escalate the situation and bring the parties in this strife to the negotiation table.
It
would help if the Philippine government eschew its studied neutrality
in the Sabah issue and sit down with the Sultanate. Lives have been
lost. It does not matter that the body count is Muslim. They are still
Filipinos. A commitment by this government to pursue the Sabah claim
which is a valid claim and rendered compelling by constitutional,
judicial and congressional pronouncements will help to initiate
disengagement by combatants. This should then be followed by
consolidating the claims of the heirs who still have to present a common
position. After this, the bilateral talks with Malaysia can proceed. It
would help to solicit the support of the ASEAN which has resolved in
various fora to act as mediator in disputes involving member countries.
On February 27, 1947, Francis B. Harisson, in his capacity as adviser
to the President of the Philippines, wrote a letter to Elpidio Quirino
who was then Vice-President and concurrently Secretary of Foreign
Affairs, important excerpts of which read as follows:
“I have the honor to submit herewith the portfolio of papers
prepared under your direction, concerning the present status of those
territories in North Borneo over which, since 1714, the Sultanate of
Sulu has held sovereignty.
In an earlier memorandum dated
September 26, 1946, and now in this file, I advised the Philippine
Government to protest to the Government of Great Britain against the
latter’s announcement of July 16, 1946, that the State of North Borneo
had become a Crown Colony of the British Monarchy. This Annexation took
place just twelve days after the Inauguration of the Republic of the
Philippines, and was done in derogation of the rights of the Sultanate
of Sulu.
Meanwhile, further important evidence has come to us
from the Philippine Embassy in Washington, where Mr. Eduardo Quintero,
searching in the National Archives, found a photostatic copy of the
document dated January 22, 1878, upon which the British Government bases
their claim to all the lands tributary to the Sultanate of Sulu. This
was obtained in 1940 by the United States Department of State from the
British Government, and is hereto annexed.
The second copy of
this document had been held by the Sultan of Sulu, and, as is alleged,
was stolen from him during a visit he made to Singapore many years ago.
This story is to be found in the newspaper article in the Chicago Daily
Tribune of October 14, 1945, written by Mr. Aleko Lilius in an
authenticated interview with the late Sultan of Sulu.
The
photostatic copy of this document, furnished by the British Government
has been translated at my request by Mr. Harold Conklin, assistant to
Professor H. Otley Beyer in the University of the Philippines. Mr.
Conklin is a qualified scholar in the Malay language and in the Arabic
script in which language and writing this document was written . . . I
shall take up again one point made in that paper, namely the argument
of Justice Mackaskie that upon death in 1936 of Sultan Jamalul Kiram II,
President Quezon did not “recognize” any new Sultan of Sulu in response
to enquiries from the North Borneo Government. I wish to reiterate my
previous statement that so far as the Sultanate of Sulu was concerned,
President Quezon had no legal power to abolish the Sultanate—that could
have been done only by the Moros themselves, either by positive action
of their own, or by neglect to elect a new Sultan —but promptly
thereafter two Sultans of Sulu were chosen by rival factions. The only
other way in which an ancient State like the Sultanate of Sulu could
have been abolished would have been by force, as, for example by armed
conquest, and that determination of the question was, of course, lacking
in the premises.
As to the question as to what should now be
done by the Government of the Republic of the Philippines in this
matter, I wish to enter here the opinion expressed by Dr. Beyer on page
10 of his memorandum of December 8, 1946 . . . as follows:
“The
question as to whether the present Government of the Republic of the
Philippines should take any definite action in the way of officially
recognizing the existing Sultan of Sulu is a matter of public policy on
which I have no desire to make any specific recommendation. In the
interest of peace and welfare of the numerous Mohammedan citizens of the
Sulu Archipelago, however, I believe that it is a matter that should
sooner or later receive serious consideration from the President and his
Cabinet with a view to arriving at some just solution of this vexatious
question.”
Your Government has honored me with a request for an
opinion on these matters, and I recommend that the Sultanate of Sulu be
advised to eliminate the existing anomaly of having two rival Sultans,
and that they elect only one legal Sultan, and that the latter, whoever
he may be, should, as promptly as may be, request the Government of the
Republic of the Philippines on behalf of the Sultanate to protest the
absorption of their sovereign rights in North Borneo territories into a
British Crown Colony, and if met with a refusal, on the part of the
British Government, to reconsider this action, that the whole matter be
laid before the United Nations Organization for adjustment.
In
conclusion, I draw attention to the parallel situation in the adjoining
State of Sarawak which was taken by the British Government as a Crown
Colony a few weeks before similar action on British North Borneo. The
negotiations for Sarawak were made by its recent Rajah, the grand nephew
of the first Brooke who had been commissioned as Rajah or Governor of
Sarawak by the Sultan of Brunei in 1841. In 1888, Sarawak was
“recognized” by the British Government as an independent country under
the protection of Great Britain, still under a Rajah Brooke. The Third
Rajah Brooke, for certain compensation, recently ceded his country to
England as a Crown Colony. The nephew of Rajah Brooke, his successor in
line, Mr. Anthony Brooke, has made protest against the destruction of
the independence of his country; has recently (in December 1946) been
refused admission to the new Crown Colony of Sarawak; has aroused
support both in Sarawak and in the British Parliament, and he now
proposes to lay the whole matter before the United Nations Organization.
In reviewing the subject of the claims of the Sultanate of Sulu
to their ancient patrimony in North Borneo, one must come to the
conclusion that the action of the British Government in announcing on
the sixteenth of July, just twelve days after the inauguration of the
Republic of the Philippines, a step taken by the British Government
uniterally, and without any special notice to the Sultanate of Sulu,
nor consideration of their legal rights, was an act of political
aggression which should promptly be repudiated by the Government of the
Philippines.” (UP LAW CENTER, The Philippine claim to a portion of North
Borneo—Materials & Documents; 2003, p. 104-105-D, Emphasis
supplied).
Conclusion The whole Sabah
problem, therefore, originated from the “act of political aggression”
committed by the British Government against the Sultanate of Sulu and
the Republic of the Philippines. Malaysia simply continued that
aggression to this day.
Under the Charter of the United Nations,
such aggression is unlawful. It is not considered civilized nor
consistent with the Rule of Law.
President Benigno Simeon “Noynoy” Cojuangco Aquino 3rd is either mindful or unmindful of such fact; or, cares or does not care.
In 1947, the Philippine Government he now heads was advised to promptly repudiate that act of aggression.
In 1968, the Philippine Government did.
How about under President Noynoy’s administration?
Well, he struts around wearing a shirt with an outline of the Philippine map WITHOUT Sabah. Certainly, that should make the Malaysian Government happy.
But, that should make the Tausugs and Filipinos really cry —and really angry.
Sulu Sultanate Contra Malaysia
Ghost of British Colonialism Haunting Sabah
One ordinary day, precisely, February 9th, 2013, a
band of brigands (if you listen to Malaysian authorities), or heroic
liberators (as some nationalist Filipinos living in both the Philippines
and in Malaysia would say), or simply mildly deranged and overly
romantic buccaneers (according to most people at both sides of the Sulu
Sea), landed their crafts on the green, palm-oil-plantation-covered
shores of Sabah and immediately got themselves busily engaged in
chivalrous warfare against the Malaysian nation, with the luminous goal
of bringing the state of Sabah back under the reign of the Sulu
Sultanate.
To be ‘precise’, it is often quoted that exactly 235 Filipinos (where
that precision comes from is a mystery to me), some armed, some not,
had travelled from Tawi-Tawi in the Southern Philippines, to the
dormant, and, as many would say, god-forsaken town of Lahad Datu, in
Sabah, Malaysia.
Their commander, Agbimuddin, is a brother of the self-proclaimed Sulu “sultan”, Jamalul Kiram III.
Those facts could be determined, confirmed and even re-confirmed;
those fact alone, but not much more. After that, everything suddenly
becomes a shadow play, something that would be more appropriate in the
heart of Central Java in neighboring Indonesia, than in the grotesquely
over-developed Malaysian-controlled Borneo, covered by a monoculture of
palm oil plantations.
Where did this romanticism come from? Sabah, with oil, palm oil and
unbridled logging could be easily described as one of the most
pragmatic, un-quixotic parts of Southeast Asia. And Sulu itself has been
playing bizarre international games for years and decades.
But suddenly those few, those 235 maritime samurais, were arriving
from the isles, and from a different era, ready to fight for honor and
even to die, facing the entire Malaysian state, one of the richest in
Southeast Asia, with its 29 million inhabitants.
“How daring!” Say some, while others offer a more pragmatic view: “How idiotic!”
There are more questions than answers. Who is really behind this
‘war’? Were leaders of the Sulu Sultanate calling for the attack; were
they the ones who issued the orders? And while both Malaysia and the
Philippines are presently submerged up to their ears in rather serious
political crises, could that situation be somehow connected to the Sabah
mêlée, and could some political forces be thinking that they might
benefit from the conflict?
And what about the history; how is it interlaced with the present?
Current geopolitical arrangements are, undeniably, the result of British
post – WWII colonialist schemes, just as they are the result of the
brutal oppression of left-wing forces in the entire region.
Historically. Sabah used to belong to the once powerful but now defunct Sulu Sultanate, which is now part of the Philippines.
Leading academician, Eduardo C. Tadem, Professor from the University of Philippines in Manila, puts things to perspective:
“I have to highlight the principle of self-determination for the
Sabah people. It is a historical fact that the Sabahans were never
consulted in 1962 or 1963 a whether they wanted to be part of the
Malaysian Federation. The Cobold Commission may, in all probability,
have just fabricated the formula ‘30-30-30’. As for the Philippine
claim, it rests on the moribund Sulu Sultanate’s assertion of
sovereignty based on the grant by the Sultan of Brunei in return for a
favor in helping suppress a native rebellion. In my book, while the
transfer may have been ‘legal,’ there is no moral basis for it.
Everything then turned murky. Arguing over whether the acquisition by
the British of Sabah from the Sulu sultan was a lease or a cession
merely trivializes the whole affair.”
“There was an attempt at self-determination in 1962 when the
left-wing Brunei People’s Party led by Azahari launched a rebellion in
an attempt to unify Sabah and Brunei under a nation-state independent of
both Malaysia and Philippines. British forces with the help of Gurkha
mercenary troops swiftly crushed this rebellion. Incidentally, at the
time they launched the rebellion, the Brunei People’s Party had popular
support having won all the contested seats in the local legislature.
Then President Sukarno may have had a hand in this rebellion as Azahari
took refuge in Jakarta and died there years later. Then as now,
therefore, what matters is what the residents of Sabah want, not what
the Manila and KL governments desire.”
And one would hope, not what the Brits wanted… Although, in Malaysia,
no matter how fiery and anti-imperialist the rhetoric of Dr. Mahathir
used to be, the Brits never really left the psyche and imagination of a
substantial part of local ‘elites’. This group of dogged anglophiles has
been hopelessly enamored with the Empire; with their former colonial
masters, even when the boot had been planted squarely onto the behinds
of the local people of the region.
The Brits naturally considered ‘self-determination’ to be one of the
filthiest expressions that ever penetrated English language.
The ‘war’ began as an operatic, even burlesque occurrence.
More than 200 men were hiding deep in the jungle, or in the rubber
plantations, or in the dwellings in several stilt villages, ready to
strike mighty Malaysia. Who would not immediately recall an iconic 1959
film with Peter Sellers: “The Mouse That Roared”, about that tiny, poor,
imaginary country in the middle of Alps, called “Duchy of Grand
Fenwick”, which declared war against the United States because the
Empire refused to buy its ‘Pinot Grand Fenwick’ wine? Troops with bows
and arrows were sent on board commercial flight to New York. Their
mission is to get defeated and secure a miniature version of the
Marshall Plan. Instead, through a terrible mistake, the army of Grand
Fenwick defeats the Empire.
But in Sabah, fun did not last long and there was no Peter Sellers to turn the whole thing in to a circus.
People began dying. Clashes between ‘invaders’ and the police began,
and the Malaysian armed forces got heavily involved. Large areas were
sealed and declared out of reach for local and foreign journalists, for
‘their own protection’, naturally, Indonesian-style.
Tanks and armored vehicles were suddenly rolling down the roads of
Sabah, and Malaysia scrambled fighter jets, bombing relentlessly
‘infiltrated’ areas from the air, and then deploying heavily-armed
troops to ‘finish the job’.
The number of victims is absolutely unknown. Suddenly, all this
turned into damn serious stuff, with tens of thousands of people
displaced, on the move.
Manila Standard Today reported that by the end of March 2013,
at least 12 battalions of Malaysian soldiers and policemen, or more than
7,000 men, were searching for Agbimuddin and his men.
By the end of the month of March, according to official counts, at
least 73 people died in the battles – 63 Sulu insurgents, eight
Malaysian policemen and two soldiers.
Or this is what the public has been told.
Combatants are not the only victims, and official Malaysian statistics name no civilian casualties.
But at least 4,000 Filipino men, women and children fled Sabah,
fearing for their lives. From my own investigation, the real number of
those who left Malaysia, as well as those who have been in hiding in
Borneo, could easily reach the tens-of-thousands, at the most
conservative estimate.
We are scared”, whispers a lady selling basic
foodstuff in the heart of a humble stilt village, which saw, recently, a
series of brutal exchanges between insurgents and Malaysian police.
“We are scared”, whisper three boys, who are only in their early
teens. They are taking me around, pointing at the places where some of
the most gruesome killings took place. We are flouting all security
precautions, as we dash into the houses abandoned by their inhabitants,
then walking on wooden, elevated walkways, some of them badly damaged,
some still bearing clearly visible bullet marks and blood stains. This
is where people, some militants and some police officers, had been shot,
others hacked to death or decapitated alive. “We don’t know who is
watching us now, or who is listening,” murmur the boys. “Just take
photographs quickly, and let’s get out of here, please!”
“I am scared”, shouts a boatman over the roar of his engine,
navigating small high-speed craft between seemingly endless forests of
stilts. “I am not refusing to take you around; we can sail under the
houses for hours, but I don’t dare to land here. You can disembark one
kilometer away and walk back to this town. Please understand: there are
commandos inside this kampong. If they see me land, I could lose my license, I could be captured, I could be questioned and interrogated.”
“Could they disappear you?” I ask.
He pretends not to hear my question.
“Philippine people are scared and they had to flee”, I am told by a
driver who agrees to take me to the overblown police station at the
outskirts of Semporna City. “Thousands of them had to flee. They have
been petrified since ‘the events’. It is like an exodus!”
In the morning, as I sit by the water, in a local café, an old man
walks slowly towards my table. “What are you doing here?” He asks. I
point at my massive professional camera resting on top of the table,
making acquaintances with the fresh carrot juice. “So now it came to
that,” comments the grandpa, sadly. “International press in this town,
that used to be visited only by divers and adventurers.”
“Are you also scared?” I ask him, because everybody else seems to be. “Yes I am”, he nods.
“Of whom?” I ask.
He does not reply.
“Of whom?” I insist.
He leaves, abruptly.
The old man forgot to mention that for years and
decades before the conflict, it was not just divers and adventurers, but
mainly hundreds of thousands of legal and illegal migrant workers,
predominantly from the Philippines, but also from India, Indonesia,
Bangladesh and elsewhere, who have been coming to Sabah, in search of
relatively well-paid jobs.
He also forgot to say that this was not so ‘unexpected’, that it was
not the first ‘incident’. At least 21 Lahad Datu inhabitants were killed
when Sulu pirates invaded the shores of Sabah and looted local bank and
Malaysian Airlines office in 1985. And there were kidnappings, later,
from the Sandakan area.
Sabah, with its, by the region’s standard, high salaries, has been
like a strong magnet for migrants arriving from the Philippine islands
of Mindanao, Basilan and Sulu, and from the Indonesian parts of Borneo
called Kalimantan, both areas easily definable as some of the poorest in
Southeast Asia. Remittance stores in Sabah’s cities openly advertise
the transfer of funds to the Philippines, India, Bangladesh, Indonesia
and several other countries that are regularly sending millions of
workers to much richer parts of the world.
Before the recent ‘war’, there was a Filipino migrant community
living in Sabah over 800,000-strong, the majority without official
papers and therefore vulnerable to exploitation and abuse.
All this created confusion, tension and even open hostility and discrimination, something that was always very well concealed.
There were anti-immigrant lobbies and pro-immigrant ones; there were
those who wanted to keep Sabah predominantly ‘native’ and ‘Malaysian’,
as well as those who were interested on getting their hands on as many
immigrants as possible, in order to take advantage of cheap and badly
organized labor.
Hardly anybody came here because of love for the place: Sabah state
is not only humid and hot; it is filthy, and outrageously boorish. Here,
one could easily forget that this is Malaysia, a middle-income country
that has aspired (for decades), to join the so-called developed world.
With garbage-covered streets, rubbish floating next to and off the
seashores, with children begging at food markets and street corners, the
cities of Sabah resemble some Philippine or Indonesian urban centers,
with primitive or collapsed infrastructure, an acute lack of hygiene,
public transportation and appalling social policies.
It is not only the outsiders who are noticing the rot. The opposition
State Reform Party claimed, recently, that Sabah health care is in a
deplorable condition, everywhere; in some cases it says it is
unacceptable. There is a feeling of thorough hopelessness here, mostly
unknown in the rest of the country, especially in the glitzy and
cosmopolitan Kuala Lumpur or elegant, historic and ‘oh so’ Chinese
cities like Georgetown on Penang Island or Kuching in Sarawak.
Sabah used to be the second richest state in Malaysia, after
Selangor, at least on paper, and mainly due to its unregulated logging
and later introduction of palm oil plantations. Those have been managing
to ruin almost all of state’s native fauna and flora, turning it into
near Indonesia-style environmental nightmare, but the earnings used to
be high.
Lately the greed, mismanagement, and unequal distribution of wealth,
has turned Sabah into the second poorest state of Malaysia. Apart of
palm oil, Sabah also produces crude oil, but, like in the Gulf, the
natural wealth of the area does not necessarily translate into
prosperity for the majority of the inhabitants. Children here are often
running barefoot and many adults appear to be illiterate. It is not only
medical care that is in disastrous state; it is also education.
I get to work, trying to collect as many testimonies
from the ground as possible. There seems to be no foreign press in the
city of Semporna; all journalist left soon after the first wave of
fighting subsided.
This is the area that registered the largest number of Malaysian casualties, most likely 6, but possibly much more.
There are several theories about what happened. The most accepted one
is that on 2 March 2013, ten alleged insurgents were holed inside a
house in a humble stilt village at Simunul, concretely in its
dilapidated section called Lorong 5, and that they were
discovered by police. That’s what I am told by the locals; those few who
are still left here; those who dared not to abandon their homes.
One of the local kids, Azman bin Ahmad is my self-designated guide.
His grandparents came from Sulu, but he feels Malaysian. I don’t ask for
it, but he insists on flashing his official Malaysian ID at me,
repeatedly, as if feeling the need to prove his own identity to himself,
to me and to the world.
Azman and his mates are taking me through Lorong 5, to the house where the gruesome exchange took place. Elevated, stilt-supported walkways form a complex, fascinating labyrinth.
“There was terrible battle right at this place”, explains Azman.
“Just look at those marks! They are all over and they are from the
bullets. And, here – see the blood? At one point, police officers and
insurgents all fell to the water… And the water was red from blood. It
was just awful…”
I ask Azman and his friends to explain exactly what happened here.
“There were some 10 or more people gathering here, inside the house. They were all from Sulu. During the prayer time, between Maghrib and Isha (between 6:30pm and 7:30pm), they were conducting ‘tahlil’,
a prayer for those who died earlier in the battle at Lahad Datu, some
200 kilometers away from here; from Semporna. Then a group of police
officers moved in; they were progressing towards the house, obviously
tipped off by locals. Police were armed. One of them kicked the door of
the house open… Then everything began happening with the lightning
speed: several men were behind the door. They grabbed the nearest police
officer and killed him on the spot. After that, many shots were fired. I
don’t know who was firing at whom, but I think that the shooting was
coming from both sides. They say that six police officers died as well
as three or more of Sulu people. You can see there, and there, where the
bullets hit the walls.”
One of the boys jumps in, impatiently. He goes ballistic, arguing
that the Sultan of Sulu is not really a sultan, and how the fighters who
landed in Sabah had been fooled; how all that has been happening is one
huge farce.
Whether farce or not, the scene of the worst documented battle of
this conflict definitely looks eerie. Stilt walkways collapsed; some
parts are submerged, broken, and there is nobody around.
I peek into the houses and everything inside them is upside down, torn apart and smashed; in absolute disarray.
“Malaysian commandos came here on several occasions, and destroyed everything”, explains one of the boys.
There are some family photos on the wooden bench, left intact. These
are images of content looking men, women and children, posing with warm
smiles on their faces. ‘What happened to them?’ I think. This is the
house where the killings took place. ‘What is really going on?’
People on the photographs do not look at all threatening.
It appears that nobody in Kuala Lumpur and in Manila
actually understands what is going on here. And it appears that it is
supposed to remain like that.
Irwanizam bin Mad Jais, a Bajau native, is also confused by the present situation:
“The majority of citizen of Semporna are Bajau and Suluk people. Many
came from Sulu and then settled here. Some of them have already lived
in Sabah for more than 10 years, and are in possession of ID (IC) cards.
They are definitely not some kind of ‘outsiders’“.
When I ask about the battle in Semporna; at Simunul, Lorong 5, he immediately voices his doubts:
“I heard that three or more policemen died in the fights at Kampung Simunul.
They were sent here from Serawak and from Kuala Lumpur. There are some
things that I don’t comprehend: the government has been saying that the
attackers who died all came from Sulu, that they were followers
of Sultan of Sulu. What I know is that Sulu fighters usually wear
elaborate and scary uniforms, and they are armed. I saw with my own eyes
those people who died in Lorong 5, and were later called ‘Suluk
fighters’ by the government. They didn’t wear any uniforms. Three dead
bodies carried out of the village by the police were wearing traditional
Malay clothes. It appeared as if they were just woken up from their
sleep, killed, and immediately carried away. And there were no guns. I
don’t understand why the police killed these three men. Frankly, I don’t
think they were the insurgents.”
I ask him about police brutality:
“There is plenty of it now. I don’t understand why police tends to be
so violent towards the common people here? They are conducting frequent
raids. And we are afraid because they are carrying guns. I am a citizen
of Sabah. I have IC. I make money by driving my own car. But they are
questioning me, and my friends, as if we were a bunch of criminals. Why
don’t they catch and punish real criminals and those who want to take
over our State?”
I am told that Malaysian police brutality in Sabah is taboo; it is
scarcely investigated and almost never mentioned in local media reports.
In Kuala Lumpur, Malaysian college lecturer and filmmaker, Kia Meng Boon, later explained:
“Peninsula Malaysians lack access to independent media in the
country, where citizens could learn the facts and judge the real
situation on the ground for themselves.”
It is no secret that Malaysian media and intellectuals are not
renowned for their courage. I was told by several of my friends and
colleagues in Kuala Lumpur, that ‘the government has really made this
into a security issue’ and commenting on the situation would ‘not be
strategic.’
Predictably, police and armed forces on the ground have their lips
sealed. I visited both gunboat docks, and one enormous police station
where few dozens of captured militia members are allegedly held. The
answers were invariable:
“We are very sorry, but we can not talk about those incidents at all.
There are people with more authority than us who can enlighten you. For
instance, you can go to Police Headquarters.”
I asked Nadira Ilana, Malaysian filmmaker, who is originally from
Borneo, whether the battles are actually ‘real’. There are countless
rumors in both the Philippines and Malaysia that political interests
actually orchestrated the conflict.
“Not sure what the rumors are in Kuala Lumpur, but there are clearly
many rumors in Sabah”, she replied. “I personally don’t think it was
politically arranged. Both Malaysia and the Philippines are facing
election years. I can’t imagine how this incident could help either
party… Yes, the Sabah attacks were very much real. It’s not the first
time Sulus have attacked Sabah but it may be the first time we’ve been
attacked over the Sabah claim…”
Then she concluded: “I think the Sabah claim was laid dormant after
the formation of Malaysia, which unintentionally and perhaps indirectly
sparked the Mindanao-Philippines civil war. If it were not for Sabah’s
Suluk Chief Minister Tun Mustapha, Malaysia and Libya, Mindanao would
not have become an autonomous region. The Sulu claim on Sabah seems to
fluctuate depending on Mindanao-Philippines relations, which is why I
see these recent attacks as a spillover from Philippines’ politics
rather than a BN ploy.”
Malaysian Got out of North Borneo Sabah
Profit over planet – Malaysia-style. - Rape of Sabah Hills by Malaysians
It is quiet and peaceful at Café Melaka, on Semporna seafront. Two
ladies wearing headscarves are watching a soap opera, as if there was no
drama, much more gripping than a television one, consuming their state.
The scenery around is fantastic; traditional structures emerge from
the sea, built on wooden supports. There are entire man-made islands
resting on stilts, mostly inhabited by native sea-bound people who only
opted for this ‘lifestyle compromise’ in recent years and decades.
Mountains encircle the cove. There is a constant flow of slow and
high-speed boats shuttling people between the Borneo mainland and the
islands in the bay.
As I clean my camera lenses, slowly sipping bitter coffee, an old man I met earlier, returns. He is obviously eager to talk:
“It is terrible”, he sighs, refusing to sit next to me, as if ready
to deliver memorized speech. “Here, we have no experience with such
things. In other countries they would know what to do, but we are
peaceful here. In Lahad Datu they had to face this situation in March,
but we thought that here we would be spared. Suddenly, six police
officers were murdered.”
‘Three or five or six’, I think. They cannot even agree on the numbers…
The old man continues his lament: “My friend told me that one entire
commando had to come to retrieve bodies, because police would not dare
to rescue corpses of their fallen comrades… I was also told that most of
the officers were not shot; they were hacked to death, cut to pieces…”
At the end he gets philosophical: “In this part of the world, we may
get the same color of hair, but who knows what is taking place inside
our heads?” And he adds, laconically: “This also illustrates how
thoroughly uneducated were the attackers. What did they think? That they
would manage to capture the entire State of Sabah with that little band
and their bare hands?”
Traumatized North Borneo Sabah kids at the scene of the battle.
There is only one tiny step from outrage to bigoted talk, even to discrimination itself.
The Filipino people, both those who have lived here for generations and those who came illegally, have mostly left the area. Lorong 5 is now half-empty – only Malaysians and some Indonesians stayed.
I hired a boat and went to the biggest island in the bay – Palau
Bum-Bum – right across the water from Semporna. As I was arriving to
jetty, mighty police speedboats were busy landing dozens of heavily
armed men on the island.
I asked an Indonesian worker, a young girl named Zuraida, what
happened to the Filipino people who have been living on the island for
decades.
“Several of them used to work here, with us, but they are in hiding
now. I have no idea where they went,” she said. I got the feeling that
even if she would know, she would not tell, and for very good reasons.
The atmosphere, the mood all around Sabah is very bad. Most of the
‘foreigners’ have left, and some nationalist elements are now on the
loose.
Pulau Bum-Bum is no exception. In very un-Malaysian and rude fashion,
some minivan drivers speak to me in an obscene, insulting way: “Hey
boss, hey you! Where you go?”
Heavily armed police move down the road.
Then the skipper who is taking me back to Sabah mainland is passing
by ‘ice village’, where huge bricks of ice are waiting in awful heat to
be transported to towns and villages all over the bay:
“People who are living in Lorong 5 have no clue about
Malaysian law. They think here it is similar to what they have back at
home – lawlessness. That’s why they think they can just come over and
try to take Sabah. They are coming here from their proud and isolated
sultanate, and they think that we – Malaysians – are lower then they
are… And on top of that, their leaders in Sulu have tricked them by
making promises that cannot be fulfilled!”
He goes on and on. Finally he begins sounding approximately the same
as German neo-Nazis, and he is carrying quite a similar message. Except
that he is speaking Malay.
Yes, the fear is everywhere. I walk to restaurant in a
shack, near the road. One of the waitresses is married to a boy who
used to live in Lorong 5.
I order a serving of awful fried noodles and ask her about her
family. She studies me, for a while, then decides that I could be, most
likely, trusted:
“My in-laws had to flee and to spend one entire week in hiding”, she explains.
“Has it been tough here for you?” I ask.
She nods. “There were tanks here. Big tanks, which you see in the movies… right here, on this road.”
On the way back to Tawau Airport, all that can be seen are enormous
palm oil plantations. Their size is monstrous. The land is terribly
scarred. There is no native forest left in the entire area, everything
is logged out, destroyed. It is almost one hundred kilometers of
uninterrupted and foreign monoculture.
“Do local people like this?” I ask the driver.
“Those who work in the industry – they do. The rest hate it. But what can they do?”
Tawau Airport is half-deserted. Like all over Sabah, people are
sleeping with their heads on the table, including staff. Few kids are
hanging around untidy eatery:
“With this conflict, I think business is down by 50%. You see that it
is not as crowded as it used to be, and today is Friday, people used to
travel a lot on this day… We have many Filipinos living here. We used
to coexist in peace. Now there are prejudices on both sides…”
I got bumped off half-empty Malaysian Airlines flight. Their system
jumped one month on my return ticket to Kuala Lumpur, not unusual
occurrence for this airline with appalling customer service record. A
check-in counter clerk shot his hateful glimpse at me, and then sent me,
with spite, to nearby ticket office. There, inefficient and openly
hostile agent began insulting me, before offering to re-instate the seat
for approximately 300 dollars, three times the price of the original
fare.
I flashed the gold card of One World alliance, which Malaysian
Airlines recently joined, but they laughed in my face, and insulted me
some more. I protested. Immediately, a couple of passengers stood up and
threatened to call police. “There are children here”, they shouted at
me. To protest injustice is obviously illegal here. I bought a one-way
ticket on low-cost Air Asia and lost my Malaysian Airlines ticket
altogether.
Sabah is overflowing with anger and bad moods, with bad will,
frustration, concealed grievances, and both concealed and unconcealed
violence.
The attacks were recent, but begging children, filth and destroyed
environment are something that Sabah has been enduring for decades.
The medieval, feudal way in which the island of Borneo has been
governed, as well as the cowardice of Malaysian intellectuals, many of
whom are too comfortable, too lazy, too spoiled by Western funding and
therefore thoroughly unwilling to address almost any uncomfortable
issues in their country, are partially to blame for the set of
nightmares that form the reality of the state of Sabah.
There are certain topics ‘ignored’ even by the opposition, unless
some substantial financing from abroad is secured: like the savage
logging practices exercised by Malaysian companies operating both at
home and abroad, like the palm oil and ethnic/minorities issues.
Naturally there are some exceptions; those individuals who are aiming at
being little bit more than just some supermarket toy coin-horses, but
sadly, very few.
The British colonial madness is also hardly addressed here, and its
legacy is seen as some wise, even supreme type of guidance. This madness
goes on and on, unchallenged and uncorrected.
The little invasion, the little war, will stop. Eventually,
everything will calm down. After some year will pass, everything will be
forgotten. Bizarre little wars and conflicts have tendency to parish
from the memory of the people, especially if their roots are not
analyzed and publicly debated.
Palm oil will probably make it, eventually, even to some city parks
and private gardens. I would not be surprised if the palm oil
plantations would be, one day, declared as inseparable part of Malaysian
culture.
The Filipino community will keep enjoying ‘tolerance and lack of
discrimination’, it was told to be enjoying by the Malaysian officials.
The regional political situation will continue to be confusing, even
schizophrenic. To illustrate it: just a couple of days before the
conflict, I was told by one of the Commanders of the Moro National
Liberation Front (MNLF) that if the Sulu Sultanate ever demanded the
return of Sabah to the Philippines, MNLF would fight leadership of the
Sultanate. Instead, at one point after the invasion, MNLF declared that
they ‘couldn’t stop their own fighters from joining the insurgents,
anymore’.
In Malaysia, there will be no referendum on Sabah issue, or on any
other essential matter. And there will be no serious revision of the
colonial past despite the fact that it has been, periodically and
nastily, merging with the present.
To many Filipinos Sabah is a piece of property somewhere in the
southwest Philippine Sea which was the scene of the lucrative barter
trade during the period of import and exchange controls in the fifties.
Indeed Sandakan was the source of “blue seal cigarettes” and other
luxury items that Tausug traders sent to the rest of the archipelago.
This entrepot trade provided a decent income for the sea traders of
the Sulu peninsula. The removal of controls in the sixties killed the
barter trade and a lot of inhabitants from the area started the exodus
to Sabah they consider their ancestral home to seek livelihood.
Origin of Sabah claims
It
was President Diosdado Macapagal, an economist with a sense of history,
who attempted to rewrite Philippine records. First of all he changed
the date of Philippine independence from July 4 which coincided with
that of the US, to June 12 when Aguinaldo raised the Philippine flag in
Kawit. Secondly he backed the historical claim of the Sultanate of Sulu
over Sabah.
In the 17th century the Sultanate of Sulu was riding high, extending the crescent over vast territories in Mindanao.
Since
Sabah is closer to Tawi Tawi than the island is to Zamboanga, the
Sultanate was only too happy to have been gifted with this vast expanse
of fertile land from the Sultanate of Brunei in 1658, as an expression
of gratitude for the aid extended by the Sulu Sultan’s armed forces in
stopping a rebellion. After a couple of centuries when British traders
were scouring areas in the region to convert into trading posts, the
Sultanate agreed to a real estate deal that it has regretted to this
day.
The year is 1878—a contract is signed between Sri Paduca
Amulana al Sultan Mohammad Jamalul Alam, representing the Sultanate of
Sulu as “owner and sovereign of Sabah “and Gustavus Baron de Overbeck, a
retired bankrupt German diplomat from Hong Kong and Alfred Dent of
London representing the British East India Company later renamed the
North Borneo Company as “lessee” for a fee of 5000 dollars per year for
this northern part of the island of Borneo. The area covered 76,115
square kilometers, richly endowed with rich natural resources including
petroleum.
As a historical backdrop, the year before Queen
Victoria was crowned Empress of India and the British Empire has become
an area “where the sun never sets” because, in the words of a British
diplomat, “the natives do not trust the Brits at night.”\ Indeed
Britannia ruled the waves and the industrial revolution which started in
the Isle of Albion had made Britain globally great. The opening of the
Suez Canal in 1869 made travel to the East much faster and British
colonial possessions more accessible and manageable.
Thus the second wave of British expansion to Southeast Asia began.
It
is against this background that Alfred Dent a shrewd British trader
with strong connections in London—the financial market—cast his astute
eyes on Borneo. In London he boasted about his sweetest real estate
deal, which beat the Louisiana Purchase, the sale of Manhattan and that
of the Philippine to the US by Spain. The London capital market
responded positively and from that time on the flow of British capital
for the development of the newly acquired piece of real estate in North
Borneo has not stopped. Today the goods and services produced by the
North Bornean area is greater than that of the whole Philippines—thanks
mainly to British Shell’s petroleum fields and the plantation economy
introduced by British hacienderos among others.
Obviously the
skills and gallantry of thd Sultan and his Tausug followers in the field
of battle was not matched by business acumen. In fairness to the Sultan
of Sulu, how could an ordinary caliph with more real property than he
could efficiently oversee anticipate the return on investments to be
realized by an area more than half of Mindanao, which today contributes a
huge amount of income to the Malaysian Federation?
Indeed today
had the Sultanate held on to Sabah, the Philippines would be richer than
Malaysia and this country would not only have no brown outs in
Mindanao—it could even be exporting energy. Alas, today Malaysia’s per
capita GDP is about $5,000, double that of the Philippine economy.
A reality check
From
the time that the British acquired the territory in 1878 to the time
that it turned over the same to the Federation of Malaysia in 1963,
British capital, Japanese invaders during the Second World War and other
investors has converted the river valleys into huge palm oil
plantations and exploited the thick jungles and dense rainforests as
well as the rich mineral resources, especially petroleum. Before leaving
the territory it was therefore convenient to leave these lucrative and
permanent British and other foreign assets in the hands of a trusted
vassal. Hence the British constructed the Federation of Malaysia.
To
the credit of the former colonizer, it left behind a fairly honest and
competent bureaucracy which today continues to serve the Sabahans well,
increasing steadily the levels of productivity in the farms and insuring
adequate incomes and employment. Indeed the quality of life of the
people of Sabah is superior to that of their neighbors in the Sulu
peninsula—only a stone’s throw away!
Today Sabah is a
cosmopolitan society of different ethnic groups with Filipinos
comprising about a third of the community. It is not surprising that a
referendum held before the formation of the Malaysian federation saw the
Sabah community opting to join Malaysia rather than the Philippines.
Today
Sabah is a mainstay of the Malaysian economy. One of the 13 states, it
was at one time it was the biggest contributor to the Malaysian GNP. For
Malaysia to give away Sabah would be akin to this country giving away
the Visayas and Mindanao. It is obvious that it will never allow the
dismemberment of the Federation by giving up this prized territory, nor
will the Sabahans willingly surrender their quality of life—now the envy
of other Asean states, which is superior to that of this country in
many aspects.
On the other hand it would be difficult for the
Sultanate which has already surrendered its sovereignty to the Republic
of the Philippines, if not its proprietary rights, over the territory,
to just walk away from its historic claims admitted by Malaysia under
the Manila Accord in 1962 and subsequent discussions. The fact that
Malaysia continues to pay padjak to the heirs to this day is tacit
approval of the claims of the Sultanate. To say that this is payment for
this vast and lucrative real estate is an insult to the intelligence.
The fact that the territory derives income in terms of goods and
services greater than that of this country makes the contribution of
$1,700/pa to the heirs laughable to say the least. The amount in not
even enough to rent a three-room condo in the Global City per month.
Amb.
Jose V. Romero Jr. is a vice president of Philippine Ambassadors
Foundation Inc. (PAFI) a non-stock, non-profit and non-partisan
organization devoted to providing a forum for constructive ideas on
vital Philippine foreign policy issues
In 1968, after the Malaysian panel had unilaterally walked out of the
diplomatic talks held in Bangkok, then Senator Arturo Tolentino
delivered a speech before the United Nations General Assembly in New
York, the most inspiring excerpts of which do make all Filipinos and
Tausugs, specially the youth, proud. Read as follows:
“All these acts by which Malaysia acknowledged and recognized the
existence of the Philippine claim and the need of settling it took
place subsequent to the so-called U.N. ascertainment and the
proclamation of the Federation of Malaysia including Sabah. They prove
that in the view of the Philippines as well as of Malaysia, the claim
and the right to pursue it did not perish by the so-called ascertainment
and the inclusion of Sabah in the Federation.
“None of these
acts were unilateral acts of the Philippines. They were acts executed
jointly by both the Philippines and Malaysia, over a period of more than
four years, between February 12, 1964 and July 8, 1968. What do these
acts prove? They prove the falsity of the statement of the
representative of Malaysia that it is only the pressure of politics that
has kept the claim alive with artificial respiration. No, the claim has
survived the so-called ascertainment and the inclusion of Sabah in the
Federation of Malaysia because Malaysia itself had repeatedly given its
word to keep it alive.
“Why has Malaysia suddenly decided to
turn its back on a formal commitment which it has dutifully reiterated
from 1964 up to July this year? We will hazard an explanation. At the
Bangkok talks, it became clear to Malaysia that the Philippines has a
case, a strong case, and it therefore decided that it would be better to
lose national honor than to lose Sabah. Malaysia is now blatantly
reneging on its solemn word and the principle of self-determination is
being unscrupulously used as a convenient, deceptive cloak to cover the
ugliness of betrayal.
“Malaysia has set itself up as a litigant
and judge at the same time. Worse still, as judge, Malaysia not only has
already decided the case in its favor and against the Philippines; it
also decided that our claim is not justifiable. Pride and self-conceit
can go no further than that.
“I would suggest, however, that the
Malaysian display of arrogance springs not from self-confidence or
certitude, but rather from doubt and fear. It stands to reason that
Malaysia would more readily agree to go to court with us in the degree
that it considers our claim to be lacking in merit. The World Court,
after all, has well-established procedures for screening disputes
brought before it and throws out without much ado or ceremony cases that
are ‘a composite of fantasy, fallacy and fiction.’
“It was
never intended that Malaysia should first be satisfied that the
Philippine claim is tenable as a condition before modes of settlement
are considered. This could not have been intended for it would be an
impossible condition; surely, nobody in his right mind can expect
Malaysia to voluntarily admit that the Philippine claim is valid.
“Let
me assure this august Assembly that the Philippines does not and will
not use underhanded methods in the pursuit of its claim. Neither will it
turn its back on its commitments, under any pretext. Nor will it seek
any method of settlement outside the framework of the Charter of the
United Nations and the Manila Accord of July 31, 1963, as elaborated by
the various subsequent official statements and commitments made by both
the Philippines and Malaysia.
“That is why we have invited and
still invite Malaysia to agree to submit this legal issue to the
International Court of Justice, and have it decided once and for all. If
in its view the Philippine claim is unsustainable in law and in fact,
and it is convinced that its position will be upheld by the Court, it
has nothing to lose, and the Philippines will accept the verdict”
(TOLENTINO: Voice of Dissent; 1990, p. 496-497).
On March 23, 2013, His Majesty Sultan Fuad Kiram I of the sultanate
of Sulu and Sabah handed over to this writer a copy of his open letter
addressed to the Sabah Tausugs and Sulu Dominions Tausugs and Filipinos,
which reads as follows:
“Open letter of His Majesty Sultan Fuad A. Kiram I to the Sabah Tausugs & Sulu Dominions Tausugs & Filipinos:
To
our dearly beloved Tausug sons and daughters of “The Unconquered
Kingdom” of Our royal sultanate of Sulu dominions of Zamboanga
peninsula, Basilan, Sulu, Tawi-Tawi, Palawan and those in Sabah, We
praise and admire your strong spirit of faith in Islam and your faith in
us as your sultan.
Our beloved Royal Tausug Sultanate of Sulu (a
sovereign kingdom nation state for hundreds of years long before the
USA, Philippines and Malaysia became nations), is known the world over
as The Unconquered Kingdom, because our Royal Sultanate of Sulu, did not
surrender to the might of Spain for over 377 years of brutal conquest
by Spain. Spain was the superpower at the time.
Our undaunted and
brave Tausug warriors have experienced centuries of war and we are
known as the modern Spartans of the ancient past, who were born and bred
for war, but practitioners and champions of peace.
We are the
reigning sultan of Sulu and Sabah and head of Islam, because We are the
last son of Our beloved father, who was the sultan of Sulu from 1947 to
1973, and, being His last son by law of royal succession and
Primogeniture, We inherited all the rights, titles and positions of Our
royal father—His Majesty Sultan Muhammad Esmail Kiram I, your benevolent
sultan—who till his death in 1973 worked tirelessly all his life for
the return of Sabah to the Tausugs. Now we carry on that loyal duty and
we will not stop till Sabah is returned to the Tausug sultanate of Sulu,
and to its people, the Tausugs of Sulu and the Tausugs of Sabah that
will re-unite them as one people, once more.
Our history shows
that Sabah and Palawan, including Spratly Islands, became sovereign
domains of the sultan of Sulu since 1658 to this day. They were gifts
eternal by the sultan of Brunei to His royal cousin, the sultan of Sulu.
The Brunei sultan as a sign of gratitude ceded Sabah, Palawan and
Spratlys to the Sultan of Sulu, due to the vital military assistance
given by Our great ancestor, His Majesty Sultan Paduka Batara Shah, who
ordered Our more than 2,500 brave “royal Tausug army force,” led by the
brave Panglima Illiji, the great ancestor of Our gallant Maas Nur
Misuari, that stopped a major rebellion in Borneo and installed the true
Brunei Sultan to the throne.
That is why, we say today, the
Tausugs of Sulu and Tausugs of Sabah who belong to sultanate of Sulu
with Filipinos own Sabah, Palawan and the Spratlys.
With Sabah
added to Our Tausug sultanate dominions, this will greatly increase the
territory and land area of the Tausug Sultanate of Sulu, including an
increase of over $75 billion gross domestic product each year to our
local economy, and Our beloved people in Sulu and Sabah will benefit
markedly that will alleviate poverty of Our people, once Sabah is
returned to us.
It is Islamic, moral, honorable and patriotic
duty of every Tausug in Sulu and in Sabah and Filipino, to join the
cause of Sabah return to Us, because it is our land and Our domain, now
illegally occupied by Malaysia since 1963 to this day.
To our
Tausugs of Sabah and the Tausugs of Sulu We state in the event of Sabah
successful return, our Policy is to provide free hospitals and free
medicines, free education and free community housing for the old,
widows, orphans, the sick and the poor. We shall offer free retirement
villages for our old and aged citizens complete with medical and dental
services with entertainment and recreational facilities.
We shall
sign and have joint ventures with overseas world class universities to
set up their campuses in Our sultanate dominions, so that Our beloved
students can have free first class education, with world class standards
and diplomas, to prepare them as future leaders of our Great Tausug
sultanate.
We shall build power plants and drinking water
facilities to be available at low rates to all Our citizens, including
modern roads, seaports, airports and vital infrastructures. We shall
also provide other infrastructures needed by Our people and We will fund
and assist business and industry to flourish to provide needed jobs,
with the lowest tax levied to Our citizens. Our dearly beloved Tausugs
of Sulu and Sabah with Filipinos will benefit from the return of Sabah
to us, as one domain again of the Tausug sultanate of Sulu.
Today,
we call on our brave and resolute Tausug people of Sabah who number
over 70 percent of the population, to be strong in faith and to be calm
in the face of this current crisis. We, Our Royal Family, and Our Royal
Cabinet, along with the valiant Moro National Liberation Front (MNLF)
led by its gallant Chairman Nur Misuari, stress Our aim and concern to
save lives of Our Tausug and Filipino people coupled with their families
to be safe from harm and away from danger in Sabah.
To Our
dearly beloved Tausugs of Sulu and Sabah, in Our heart of hearts, We say
to you We have not forgotten you, for you are Our sons and daughters of
our great Tausug sultanate of Sulu, divided by Sulu Sea, but We are
united by Our undiluted Unconquered proud Tausug warrior blood, own
language, Our unique arts and culture, bonded and etched in Islamic
faith, customs, traditions and practices, that made us truly unique as a
kingdom and group of people.
We, with MNLF Chairman Nur Misuari
and the gallant and valorous MNLF, urge Malaysia to exercise maximum
tolerance and restraint so that this dispute is resolved by peaceful
means. We, with our “Royal Tausug MNLF Defense Force” will continue to
press for the return of Sabah to the Tausug sultanate of Sulu that will
benefit the Tausugs of Sulu and the Tausugs of Sabah with the Filipinos.
We
say to Malaysia not to pursue a policy of “ethnic cleansing” against
the helpless and innocent Tausugs and Filipino civilians in Sabah. Human
rights violations of Malaysia against innocent civilians, will only
further add to the anger and hatred of the Tausugs and Filipinos,
wanting to seek justice and revenge, against Malaysian brutalities.
Lastly
in the final analysis, We remind everyone Our central policy is
peaceful Sabah resolution, plus friendship, harmony, greater
understanding and solidarity of all religions that will bring us peace
and ultimate economic prosperity, we all deserved as peace loving
people. Allah bless you and yours.”
Comments
1.
The United Kingdom, Malaysia and the Philippine government are
grantees, and the sultanate of Sulu and Sabah is the grantor, insofar as
the usufruct over Sabah is concerned. They either do recognize Sultan
Fuad Kiram I as the reigning sultan, or they don’t.
2. If they do, they should waste no time in settling the Sabah issue with Sultan Fuad.
3.
If they don’t, they owe it to the Tausugs and the Filipino people to
explain why they do not recognize Sultan Fuad as the reigning sovereign
Sultan.
4. No less than Malaysia has officially recognized Fuad Kiram I as the Sultan of the sovereign sultanate.
5. Therefore, no other sultan may be properly recognized in view of the one sultanate, one sultan rule.
Photo by: Lilach Gavish
An overdue thank you
Lilach Gavish 15/04/2013
In
1940, Philippine President Quezon offered shelter to 10,000 Jewish
refugees. Last month, hundreds gathered in Rishon Lezion to commemorate
Filipino kindness.
In 1940, Philippine President
Manuel L. Quezon decided that his country would give shelter to Jewish
refugees. On the day a ship arrived carrying 300 Jewish refugees from
Nazi oppression, Quezon gave a speech in which he condemned the Nazi
persecution - an act that many heads of state avoided.
The speech led the German consul to the Philippines to protest the
president's offending the honor of the German Reich, but Quezon
nevertheless offered shelter to 10,000 Jews. Eventually, 1,500 took
refuge on the islands.
Last month, hundreds of Filipinos and Jews from all over the world
gathered at the World's Nations Cherished park in Rishon Lezion. The
event celebrated the culmination of three years' effort towards
commemorating the Philippines' gesture and inaugurated the Open Doors
monument, by renowned Filipino artist June Lee.
Government Services Minister Michael Eitan took the podium and after
describing the bonds between the Jewish and Filipino peoples, he said it
was Israel's "obligation to be especially polite to the [Filipinos]
living among us."
The Philippine tourism minister Joseph H. Durano also spoke. "We are a
tolerant people. Never have we taken part in anti-Jewish activities and
Jews never lived in a ghetto in Manila. There was an exchange of
cultures. This inauguration is a symbol of the human spirit, which is
second to that of God."
The impetus for putting up the monument was Frank Ephraim's 2003 book Escape to Manila,
in which he wrote: "The Philippines held out a promise of a safe haven
from Nazi oppression, offering survival from mass murder of the Jewish
people in Europe." Ephraim has since passed away, but his narrative
prompted the municipality of Rishon Lezion to give the monument a place
in the city's World's Nations Cherished park, even though other
organizations, such as Yad Vashem, refused to acknowledge the Philippine
government as righteous gentiles (see sidebar).
Max Weissler, 76, is one of the last survivors living in Israel who took
refuge in the Philippines. For the past few years, he has been working
to see the monument erected.
"I grew up in a region that belonged to Germany. We were the only Jews
there. One day the village cop came to my father and said 'run away
quickly. In a day or two, I'll have to arrest you.' When I was eight
years old, we arrived in Denmark as refugees. They didn't let us stay,
but did let us try and find a place to go to. My father went to the
Philippines. I went there with my mother later, in 1941. The Philippines
treated the Jews well. My mother baked cookies, and I sold them after
school. The church told them that we killed Jesus, but there was no
anti-Semitism."
While 1,500 Jews found refuge on the islands, 8,500 more could have fled
to the Philippines and thus been saved. "The president offered refuge
for 10,000," Weissler tells The Jerusalem Post, "but the Jews who
already lived in the Philippines claimed that [the refugees] would be a
burden, and that only the ones who had a profession should be let in.
One lady I knew, a nurse, wanted to bring her brothers in, but since she
didn't have enough money, they were killed in the Holocaust. The Jews
[preferred] to go to America. My cousin was on the ship St. Louis
and in 1939 was sent back to Germany, to the death camps."
Along with Weissler, the Salpeters - Simha (Simi) and his wife, Monty,
one of the first Filipino workers to arrive in Israel in the early 80s -
were active in setting up the monument. Monty - now deceased - founded
one of the first foreign workers' associations - the Asian Ladies Club,
where businesswomen, ambassadors and foreign workers from the
Philippines, India, Japan, Korea, Singapore and China met. After Monty
passed away, other women took the lead. Agnes Hoffman, a Filipina who
converted to Judaism, took part in the organization's campaign for a
monument. "We thought this would revive the group. We wanted to do more
than meet and talk."
When news of the project reached former Philippine ambassador Antonio
Modena, he brought it to the attention of the Philippine government, and
it published a tender for the monument's design.
Meanwhile, locally, "Max [Weissler] and I [dealt with] the Rishon Lezion
Municipality. Max was in touch with the remaining survivors," Salpeter
says.
The monument cost about NIS 500,000, including shipping costs from the
Philippines, much of which was raised by the Filipino community here.
"We are proud to have common history with the Israelis," says Chester
Omega Diaz, from the Philippine Council in Israel.
An estimated 35,000 Filipinos reside in Israel, employed mainly as
caregivers. The community is active in charity work both here and back
home. Former president of the FFCI (Federation of the Filipino Community
in Israel) Anne Gonzaga says: "We wanted to be a part of this. We held a
huge cultural event at the 50th anniversary for the diplomatic
relationships between the two countries, and a raffle where the first
prize was a flight to the Philippines. We dedicated all the profits to
the establishment of the monument."
The few living survivors abroad who sought safety in the Philippines
took part at the ceremony, too, arriving from the US, Switzerland and
around Israel, along with their families. Susan Bilar traveled here with
her husband, Pedro. She and her brother, who lives in San Francisco,
are among the major donors to the monument. Bilar was born in the
Philippines to a physician mother who arrived as a refugee from Germany.
From 1949 to 1977, her father served as the head of the Jewish
community in the Philippines and as Israel's honorary consul in the
Philippines.
"There is justice in the establishment of the monument," Bilar says.
"The Philippines were wonderful. I grew up in the Philippines until I
was 18, when I came to Israel to study at the Hebrew University in
Jerusalem. There's a natural affection between the Philippines and
Israel."
Ralph Preiss was born in Germany in 1930 and arrived in the Philippines
with his parents in 1939. "We had never heard of the place, which had
this remarkable 'open door' policy allowing German Jews to immigrate. My
father, Dr. Harry Preiss, would have been arrested by the Nazis if he
hadn't happened to be out of town. He went into hiding until we left
[Germany.]
"We traveled to Paris on the way to Genoa, Italy, to catch a ship for
the Far East. In Paris, we stayed with my two cousins, uncle and aunt,
who had left Berlin in 1933. They were caught when the Nazis overran
Paris and were sent to Auschwitz to be murdered. But we managed to
escape to Manila.
"Our Filipino neighbors were all warm, helpful, hospitable, and
completely without prejudice," Preiss recalls. "I have always been
grateful to the Philippines for saving my immediate family, and to the
Filipino people who have taught me hospitality and compassion to help
others."
Preiss's wife, Marta, adds "I'm an American. I have four kids with
Ralph, and if you count the next generations, it adds a lot to the 1,500
survivors."
On April 23, 1940, Quezon spoke at the dedication of Marikina Hall, a
housing facility for Jewish refugees: "It is my hope and, indeed, my
expectation that the people of the Philippines will have in the future
every reason to be glad that when the time of need came, their country
was willing to extend a hand of welcome."
"We are excited about the monument," says Gonzaga, who has been working
in Israel for five years. "It will serve as a memorial to the Filipino
people's humanitarian deed. We opened not only our doors, but also our
hearts to the Jewish people when we gave them refuge during World War
II. I feel proud as a Filipino, especially because I took part in the
project."
In Gonzaga's opinion, the erection of the monument will help strengthen
ties between Israel and the Philippines. "The Filipino community here in
Israel is excited and proud, as well. We all contributed to making this
project possible," she says.
The municipality of Marikina, where the survivors settled, also donated
money for the monument. The special slab in the form of a Magen David
was donated by the owners of a marble factory on Rom Lon Island. The
marble bears three footprints - those of Max Weissler; George
Levinstein, a survivor who lives in Miami; and of the daughter of Asher
Goffer - a former staff member at the Israeli embassy and son of
Holocaust survivors, who married a Filipina.
"I grew up as a Filipino," Weissler concludes. "I lived in the
Philippines less than 10 percent of my life, but I still feel that I'm
one of them."
Who is Righteous?
A spokesperson for the Yad Vashem Holocaust Memorial responds:
Yad Vashem is, of course, aware that Jewish refugees were allowed to
enter the Philippines in the early years of the war, and a Yad Vashem
representative attended the event honoring the Philippines in Rishon
Lezion. The welcome these Jews received in the Philippines was
unfortunately rare during these years. As the war unfolded it became
increasingly difficult for Jews to leave Europe and find a safe haven.
The subject of the world's attitude towards the refugees and the visa
and immigration policies, in general, is very broad and is addressed
extensively in our research and educational activities. The subject of
the Philippines specifically demands more thorough research, and Yad
Vashem would be happy to receive any information that would shed
additional light on the issue.
Regarding recognition as Righteous Among the Nations, this title is
awarded to individuals who risked their lives to rescue Jews during the
Holocaust. While there are certainly other accounts of noble deeds, and
efforts to help Jews, the Righteous designation is awarded to a specific
group of people who meet the criteria of the Commission for the
Designation of the Righteous, the most basic one being that there was an
element of risk involved in the attempt to rescue Jews during the
Shoah.
MANILA, Philippines - Women in the Philippines have better access to
opportunities as their male counterparts compared to any other country
in Asia.
This is according to the 2012 Gender Gap Index released by the
World Economic Forum earlier this year.
The report, assembled by experts from the University of
California in Berkely, Harvard University and the WEF, identified
the Philippines as the only country in Asia that has closed the gender
gap in terms of opportunities to education and health.
TAGUIG is Growing and the New Makati of the PHILIPPINE ISLANDS
Taguig Premier Central Business District, has
captured the Philippine real estate industry’s imagination. In recent
years, there has been a tectonic shift in the local and foreign
business sectors’ choice of prime location. Property analysts say this
may just be the beginning of even grander things for the former army
and military camp.
A key event—the opening of the Philippine Stock Exchange
at Taguig in 2016. — Signal the heightened transfer of more
prime international offices and headquarters to this Taguig City.
Soriano said that aside from The Ascott Group of Singapore (the hotel
group behind the former Oakwood Premier Hotel located at the Ayala
Center, Makati), the Shimao Group, a
developer owned by China’s fifth-richest man, Mr. Xu Rongmao, will put
up a hotel at Taguig City
This NASA satellite image, taken and released on October 17, 2010,
shows
Typhoon Megi, locally known as Juan, approaching the Philippines at
0500 GMT
Strongest Hurricane Typhoon in 4 years
Typhoon Megi packed sustained winds of 225 kilometres per hour
and gusts of 260 kph but could strengthen still before making landfall
in
Isabela province midday Monday.
With its ferocious wind and heavy rainfall,
Megi has become the most powerful typhoon
12 millions live in Metro Manila
As predicted by the Pagasa weather forecasters, Juan slammed through
Isabela with winds of 225 kilometers per hour, gusts of 260 kph in the
50-to-60 millimeter an hour range, similar to last year’s deadly
Tropical Storm “Ondoy.”
Japanese said back in ww2 that if they had Mindanao &
North Borneo Sabah,
they could feed the world
http://www.arcmediaglobal.com/nuclearph
Visit the Bataan Nuclear Power Plant-100
kilometres (60 miles) west of Manila in the Philippines. It is located
on a 3.57 square kilometre government reservation at Napot Point in
Morong, Bataan
Sandakan City
At Ease Hotel in Sandakan City
At Ease Hotel in Sandakan City
One of the Many Sandakan Side Streets
Sandakan City View
Sandakan City View from the English Tea House
Hidden species in the Philippines
Little Spiderhunter was one of the Philippine species tested.
Photo: Lip Kee Yap (Wikimedia Commons)
Many as yet unidentified bird species may
exist on the Philippines according to a recent study looking at genetic
differences between species found both on the islands, and on the
south-east Asian mainland. The Philippines has long been considered a
biodiversity hotspot. Made up of more than 7,100 islands, many of its
animal species are endemic including 64 percent of its land mammal
species and 77 percent of its amphibians. However, only 31 percent of
its bird species are regarded as endemic. A team from the US,
Singapore, Indonesia and the Philippines looked at seven species of
widespread, non-migratory passerine birds that occur both in the
Philippines and elsewhere in south-east Asia. Genetics tests found that
samples from the Philippines populations of the species were always
distinct from samples from other parts of south-east Asia. While there
are differences of opinion over whether these birds constitute new
species, these are unique genetic lineages that were unknown before,
according to Professor David Lohman, who headed the study. The results,
published in Biological Conservation, suggest that the
proportion of endemic bird species in the Philippines could be much
higher than currently estimated. “These unique genetic lineages were
unknown before, however, our research hasn’t gone far enough to say
these are new species,” said Professor Lohman. “More rigorous analysis
of the morphology may be needed to make that determination.” The study
predicts that genetic investigations of insular populations of
widespread species will frequently reveal unrecognized island endemics,
and because of the vulnerability of island habitats and their wildlife,
these species or races may be particularly susceptible to
extinction.“In no other place on this planet is conservation more
crucial than in the Philippines, continues Professor Lohman. "While the
species we studied are not in danger of extinction, other undiscovered
species might be."
Philippines, Norway play key roles in
Rice diversity
By
Cecil
Morella
Rice varieties are kept to maintain diversity.
LOS BANOS, Laguna, Philippines—In a greenhouse near the
Philippine capital, botanists grow strange grasses that bear tiny seeds
which are promptly flown to a doomsday vault under Norway's Arctic
permafrost.
The Norway deliveries are just the newest facet of a
decades-old effort by more than 100 countries to save the world's many
varieties of rice which might otherwise be lost.
A fire-proof, quake-proof, typhoon-proof gene bank set up by
the International Rice Research Institute (IRRI) in the Philippines in
1962 now holds 115,000 varieties of one of the world's most important
grains.
"We've got genes stored which could potentially help us
increase the yields of rice, improve pest tolerance and disease
resistance, and help us address the effects of climate change," IRRI
geneticist Fiona Hay said.
The rice varieties are grown at IRRI's sprawling complex at
the university town of Los Banos, two hours' drive south of Manila, so
that they can be provided—free of charge—to farmers or governments
around the world.
Yet Hay said that rice varieties were constantly being lost
forever, despite the preservation efforts of IRRI, a non-profit
organization funded by governments, multilateral banks, and
philanthropists.
Such losses are under a global spotlight this week as
delegates from more than 190 countries meet at a UN summit in Nagoya,
Japan, to map out a strategy to stop the world's rapid loss of
biodiversity in all plants and animals.
A rice variety can easily vanish due to pests, disease,
drought, or other natural disasters like a cyclone, or if for some
reason farmers simply stop planting it, Hay said.
Not just urbanization, but even farming can push wild rice
varieties into extinction.
And while some countries run their own gene banks, they are
not always successful in preserving seeds. In the tropics, high
humidity causes rice seeds to spoil after several years, Hay said.
At the IRRI gene bank in the Philippines, seeds are stored in
dry and cool conditions and can remain usable for up to 40 years.
The institute keeps its base collection in tiny, sealed, bar-coded
aluminium cans in a room kept at a temperature well below freezing.
They include a Malaysian variety that was collected soon after
the gene bank opened in 1962, some reed-like Latin American ones that
grow taller than a man, and Indian varieties that look more like
crawling weeds.
Duplicates in small foil sachets of about 400 seeds each are
stored in a separate vault kept at two degrees Celsius (35.6
Fahrenheit) and low humidity for passing on to those who need them for
farming or research.
Given the importance of the collection, extra insurance is
always desirable—hence the rice gene bank being duplicated in Svalbard,
Norway, Hay told AFP on a tour last week of the Philippine facility.
Since the Svalbard seed vault opened in February 2008, IRRI
has reproduced 70,000 of its own grains and sent them in tiny
freeze-dried aluminium cans to northern Norway, in a series of flights
that take four days.
One final delivery of about 40,000 varieties is due to be
flown out from Manila airport this week to complete the project.
The seeds include those no longer grown by farmers, plus
4,000-odd weeds with genes harnessed by scientists to make the rice
plant more aromatic and more resistant to pests and disease, and
tolerant of drought and saltwater.
Once completed, the Norway facility will act as a further
backup to a US Department of Agriculture vault in Colorado that already
holds duplicates of IRRI's seeds.
IRRI has in particular helped Cambodia's farmers to recover
from the ravages of war. The Khmer Rouge regime killed millions of
people—many through starvation--and forced farmers to grow only certain
rice varieties in the 1970s.
Flora de Guzman, senior research manager of the gene bank,
said she had once processed a request by Cambodia to send back seeds
for about 500 of their native rice varieties.
"They lost the materials during the war. We had the collection
here, so between 1981 and 1989 we repatriated the varieties that they
lost," she said.
Philippine government intensifying drive
against litterbugs By Philippine Correspondent Christine
Ong
MANILA: The Philippine government is intensifying its drive
against litterbugs.
Those caught littering will have to pay fines or render community
service.
On the first day of the re-implementation of the Anti-Littering Law,
nearly 200 people were caught throwing their trash on the streets.
One man was apprehended for throwing his cigarette butt onto the
sidewalk.
He said: "If they are going to do this, they have to make sure
there are trash cans around. If not, where will we throw our trash?"
Another woman was caught spitting on the road.
She said: "I was surprised because I did not know. I will not spit
anymore. So that I will not get caught."
Even a jeepney driver was not spared for not having a trash bin inside
his vehicle.
He said: "I left early and forgot to put a trash can at the back for
the passengers."
In place since 1996, the Anti-Littering Law prohibits littering,
dumping, and throwing of garbage in open or public places.
It also prohibits urinating and spitting on sidewalks, and dirty
public utility vehicles from plying the streets of Metro Manila.
But many have got away with it.
The Metropolitan Manila Development Authority now has a team of
environmental enforcers to run after litterbugs.
Under the Anti-Littering Law, violators will pay fines ranging from
US$12 to US$23. Those who cannot afford to pay will have to render
community service of up to 16 hours a day. Violators with unsettled
fines will not be able to get a clearance from the National Bureau of
Investigation.
Authorities are hoping that these sanctions will finally deter
litterbugs.
Betty Gendeve, chief health programme officer at the Metropolitan
Manila Development Authority, said: "This is the cause of flooding.
These small trash items clog our drainage systems. We really need
discipline so that we can have a cleaner and better Metro Manila."
Around 50 environmental enforcers will be deployed all over Metro
Manila to catch litterbugs. Philippine Metropolitan Manila Development Authority now
has a team of environmental enforcers to run after litterbugs.
Under the Anti-Littering Law, violators will pay fines ranging from
US$12 to US$23. Those who cannot afford to pay will have to render
community service of up to 16 hours a day. Violators with unsettled
fines will not be able to get a clearance from the National Bureau of
Investigation ( a.k.a. NBI - Similar to FBI of USA)
Coca-Cola to invest US$1 billion in Philippines
NEW
YORK (AP) — Coca–Cola Co. said Tuesday it will spend $1 billion in the
Philippines over the next five years to expand its presence in the
fast–growing market, another step by the world's largest beverage
company to focus more on emerging markets.
Coca–Cola has been present in the Philippines since the beginning of
the 20th century and has been locally produced since 1912. The
Philippines received the first Coca–Cola bottling and distribution
franchise outside North America, and its bottling operation is among
the 10 biggest Coca–Cola bottlers globally.
The Philippines is hoping to join the Trans-Pacific Economic
Partnership Agreement or Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the first
regional agreement in which the United States will participate in Asia,
in a bid to build business with the US.
Sabah North Borneo adopts rare and valuable
Slipper Orchid
SANDAKAN: Sabah has adopted the rare and valuable Slipper
Orchid (pic) as its official orchid.
Chief
Minister Datuk Musa Aman named the orchid when launching the five-day
Borneo Orchid Show at the Suria Sabah mall here yesterday.“I
hope we will take this opportunity to learn more about this particular
species of orchid, and strive to keep its habitat intact,” he
said.Commonly
known as the Sumazau Orchid, the Slipper Orchid (Paphiodilum
rothschildianum) has petals that resemble the hand gestures made in a
Kadazandusun traditional dance.
Musa
said it was appropriate for the Slipper Orchid to be named Sabah’s
official orchid as it was picked as the most popular species in the
Borneo Orchid Show in 2007.He said more research was needed on
the seemingly endless varieties of Sabah orchids, noting that the state
was home to at least half the orchids found in Borneo.“I believe there
are many more species yet to be discovered and documented
scientifically,” Musa added.In
this regard, he said, Sabah was fortunate to have dedicated individuals
who were actively researching the state’s native orchids resulting in
the discovery of new species.The continuous collaboration
between local orchid specialists with taxonomists, including those
based in the United Kingdom and Singapore, is vital to educate the
public on the natural treasure that exists here, said Musa.The
orchid show attracted some 20 participants from Sabah, Sarawak and the
peninsula as well as Japan and Brunei exhibiting more than 500 plants
in 62 classes of orchids.
Time to climb Sabah's Trusmadi
By Lee Yu Kit
Ever heard of Trusmadi? No? Figures.
All everyone knows is Mt Kinabalu. Nobody remembers No 2.
Maybe it’s true what they say about being Number Two — nobody
knows, let alone remembers you.
Everyone
and his brother know Gunung Kinabalu is the highest mountain in
Malaysia, and many, many people have climbed it. That’s how it is when
you are Numero Uno. What about the second highest mountain in Malaysia?
What is the second highest mountain in Malaysia?
Most
of the time, there’s a deafening silence because so few people have
ever heard of Gunung Trusmadi in Sabah, which, at 2,642m above sea
level, is a relative dwarf compared to Kinabalu.
A sun-dappled forest floor enroute to the peak.
But
that’s no reason not to climb it, which was why five companions and I
found ourselves in a speeding minivan on a scenic drive across the
Crocker Range. This rugged range of mountains is virtually in the
backyard of Kota Kinabalu, yet little visited by tourists.
To
one side of the road, down a deep ravine, was a rushing river, while a
slab of verdant rainforest rose vertically on the other side. Clouds of
mist rose, wraith-like, from damp valleys far below to obscure the road.
From
the heights of the Crocker Range, some 80km later, we descended into
the flat, sunlit valley of Tambunan. There were golden fields of padi
in the late afternoon light, a clear blue sky and lush surrounding
hills. The air was sweet.
Tambunan could have qualified as the
most idyllic postcard-village in the state. The roads were straight and
well-paved, the buildings in good repair and the town itself looked
scrubbed and prosperous.
We put up at a little resort a short
distance from town. Our hut, basic but adequate, looked out to a
disused football field beyond which was a shallow, rippling river
crossed by a wire suspension bridge. The small riverside restaurant
served surprisingly good food to the few customers it had. Hot food,
good companions, a murmuring river nearby, peace and quiet in a remote
corner of the country — what more could one ask for?
Wild orchids in the Gunung Trusmadi forest reserve.
The
next morning, our two 4WDs left the tarred road for an unpaved logging
road a few kilometres from Tambunan town. The air was cool and fresh,
with logged forest on either side of the road. At some point, the
gradient became steep enough for our driver to lock the freewheels of
the vehicle. Some distance later, we turned a corner and I gaped.
Up
ahead was the largest butterfly I had ever seen in my life. It was a
Rajah Brooke Birdwing, no less, with distinctive green triangles on
black wings, but with a wingspan well over 3m wide.
For a
fleeting moment, the thought of Nature striking back for all the
indignities we heap upon the blemished land crossed my mind — the
Attack of the Giant Butterflies. And that was before I noticed the
giant Rafflesia and giant pitcher plant near the butterfly.
Alas,
the butterfly was really a gate, cleverly constructed so that each of
the “wings” swung out 90˚ to allow vehicles to pass. Disappointingly,
the giant Rafflesia and pitcher plant were also fake — cement
reproductions of the real thing. A carnivorous pitcher plant of that
size would have been a sensation for horror film aficionados.
We were, in fact, at the ranger station, gateway to the Gunung
Trusmadi forest reserve.
A
ranger was despatched to accompany us to ensure we didn’t get up to any
mischief. His name was Heli, and he was a cherubic and eternally
cheerful character who spoke little and ate lots. He joined our guide,
Brown, and our porter Lius.
Brown was a lean, wiry man. A padi
farmer, he had climbed the mountain “countless times”. He worked in
Kuala Lumpur years ago but returned to the clean air and life of a
farmer in Tambunan because he felt it was a better life.
The Nepenthes macrophylla is only found on Gunung
Trusmadi.
Lius
(as in “Cornelius”) looked like he had walked out of a cartoon. He was
pleasantly chubby, with a round face and shaven head except for a slick
tuft of hair just above his forehead.
We trundled along in the
4WDs, steadily climbing a gravelly road until we ground to a halt where
the road ended. In front of us rose a wall of dense unlogged forest. A
small opening was the beginning of the trail. A marker indicated that
the summit was 5km away.
We stepped into another world where the
light was dim with trees rising silently around us. There was a thick
carpet of fallen leaves and bright green moss underfoot. The moss clung
to tree trunks and decorated branches, imparting to some trees the
appearance of some hoary monster.
It was like walking on
hallowed ground, being in this mossy forest of silence and filtered
light, of greens and browns. A few hundred yards in, we emerged at a
clearing with the surprising amenities of a toilet, a rest area and tap
water, drawn from an enormous plastic storage tank. It was just one of
two such rest areas we would come across.
A gigantic Rajah Brooke gate.
Our
path led us upward into cooler terrain, eventually emerging at the top
of a vegetation-covered ridge. We glimpsed a sea of cloud below us,
crashing noiselessly against the dense forested mountains. The ridge
undulated, descending precipitously, almost vertically in places, and
then rising sharply again like a sinuous dragon’s back. Up and down we
went, following Brown.
In the late afternoon, we came to our
campsite. We had just descended from a high point on the ridge, and
onto a broad flat rock ledge. A large tarpaulin had been secured over
the camp, which housed a number of metal bunk beds within. Solar panels
provided enough energy to power a single light bulb.
A little to
the side was the roofed, linoleum-floored kitchen, and further down the
slope was the toilet. Running water was available. It was all more
civilized than we had expected. The summit was 1.5km from the camp.
While
dinner was being prepared, we pulled on fleece jackets against the
cold. A fine mist descended. The trees around us appeared ghost-like in
the evening gloom. After dinner, we curled up in sleeping bags as the
temperature dropped into the low teens.
The view from the Trusmadi ridge.
At
4am in the morning, exhaling resulted in puffs of vapour. Outside, the
sky was a sheet of dark velvet penetrated by the diamantine light of
distant stars. The lights of Tambunan twinkled in a valley far below.
Someone turned on his iPhone music player, and Susan Boyle sang I
Dreamed a Dream as I turned on my LED headlamp and stepped out into
the dark forest, behind Brown.
I
soon began to warm up from the hike, concentrating on the pool of light
in front of me. Shadows danced at the sides, but all I had to do was to
focus on that little piece of trail lighted by my headlamp. We climbed
silently, the occasional grunt of exertion breaking the silence. I felt
a whiff of breeze on my face as we ascended a steep slope onto open
ground. Silhouetted against the dawning sky was a windmill!
I
clambered up the slope and beheld banks of solar panels and a building
on a flat area of the ridge. We had come all this way to experience the
wilderness and yet here was the very sort of thing we had sought to
leave behind! The whole thing was a transmission or repeater station of
some kind, and it was unmanned.
A few hundred yards away, we
hiked up a slope, and emerged from the bushes onto the summit of Gunung
Trusmadi. A trigonometric point with a Malaysian flag on it marked the
highest point, but my attention was drawn to the horizon, for there,
with its unmistakable serrated silhouette, was the massif of Gunung
Kinabalu.
It was so clear, I could see the lights of Laban Rata
resthouse and the dim flickering lights of climbers ascending to the
summit. Within minutes, the scene was obscured by a dense bank of
cloud. We must have seen hundreds of sunrises, yet sunrise seen from a
mountaintop is always special. You feel the splendour of the empyrean.
We
stood in silence as dawn slowly suffused the sky and threw the clouds
into sharp relief, and colour crept into the day. The magic was broken.
We took photographs, and turned back.
There was one more thing:
on the way down, in the light of day, I paused before a magnificent
specimen of pitcher plant. Here was an example of Nepenthes
macrophylla, a species found only on this mountain and nowhere else
on the planet.
The
pitcher was large and had deep, wicked looking ribs with sharp ends on
the rounded lip. These pointed downwards to prevent prey which had
fallen into the cup from escaping. There were other species of pitcher
plants, too, but I could not find the Nepenthes trusmardiensis,
another pitcher plant unique to this mountain.
Still,
a little thrill ran through me to witness something as beautiful and
bizarre as these strange carnivorous plants. I turned and followed
Brown back towards camp.
The sun sets at the Taytay Fort,
or Fuerza de Santa Isabel, built in 1667 by the Spanish.
Palawan province is made up of about 1,700 islands
iReporter Rebecca High describes it as "engaging,
enigmatic, diverse"
"I didn't want the typical Boracay beach resort
experience," High said
(CNN) -- Dazzling beaches, pulsing jungles, rich
underwater life and friendly locals greet visitors to the Philippines'
Palawan province, made up of about 1,700 islands along the country's
western edge.
A top destination for nature lovers, Lonely Planet describes
Palawan as "a magnificent, coral-fringed range of jungle-clad
mountainous islands jutting up dramatically from the Sulu Sea."
iReporter Rebecca High, 22, recently visited friends serving
in the Peace Corps in Palawan.
High, currently living in Seoul, South Korea, was struck by
the contrast between the area's poverty and its remarkable natural
beauty. She answered six questions about her experience on iReport.com:
iReporter Rebecca High in Palawan, wearing a palm frond hat
crafted by a Palawan Tour Guide.
Top not-to-be-missed experience. Why?
Riding the bus from Puerto Princesa up through the heart of
the island to El Nido, at the northern shore ... it's the ultimate
Filipino experience: crowded into a small dirty bus with open windows
and beautiful people of all ages and stories. Plus you have time to
marvel at the rugged beauty, squalor, and everything in between.
First impression, and did it change?
Waiting for a connecting flight from Manila to Puerto
Princesa, I came face-to-face with this sign on the back of a bathroom
stall: "Life is a process not a destination, a mystery to be lived, not
a problem to be solved."
A view of the coastal village of Taytay in Palawan,
Philippines
It was the perfect motto to confront after a stressful week at
work and mad rush to the airport that morning. I walked out of the
bathroom and looked out the huge windows of the airport, across the
runway to the green hills and palms beyond. And I knew that this would
be a life-changing adventure. My impression didn't change, and I
consider my time in Palawan a very worthwhile education.
Lasting memory
Discovering hidden lagoons, caves, islands, and seeing my
first in-the-wild sea turtle while snorkeling off Taytay and El Nido.
Three adjectives that capture this place
Engaging, enigmatic, diverse
High ate this cooked squid dish at Squido's in El Nido.
Biggest surprise
Wow, dirt roads and motorcycle taxis in the island's capital?
This is third world! But these boys are the most adorable and
respectful shuttle drivers I've ever had! I did indeed love it, but
traveling with American Peace Corps [volunteers] and through the rural
Philippines is hard work! It's well worth it, though. I didn't want the
typical Boracay beach resort experience, and I surely didn't get it!
Most delicious food, drink or place to eat
Stuffed squid in El Nido was memorable, mango and avocado
shakes were divine, and one of the best cottages and kitchens of all
was La Casa Rosa in Taytay. Overlooking the old fort and the bay, they
served us lomi (noodles), adobo, pizza, and San Miguel [beer] as the
living jungle around us hummed into the wee small hours.
Have you been to the Palawan? For Room
Booking: PALAWAN.COM
By Adrienne Mong/ NBC News
The Philippines consists of some 7,000
islands — a vast archipelago that makes it hard to police.
Most notably, the Philippine military succeeded in weeding out
extremist elements from the local population – particularly in Basilan
province – by working with U.S. Special Forces on a humanitarian
assistance campaign to improve villagers’ lives while at the same time
pursuing combat operations.
“[It’s] dramatically improved in terms of the security
situation, in
terms of the population having more freedom to move around to do their
daily business,” said Maj. Gen. Emmanuel Bautista, the AFP’s deputy
chief of staff for operations.
Those efforts further paid off when the country’s largest
Islamic
insurgent group, the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) – some of
whose members are believed to be closely allied with both Jemaah
Islamiyah and Abu Sayyaf – officially disavowed terrorism and
re-engaged in on-again, off-again peace talks with the Philippines
government.
In fact, MILF has been keen to involve the Americans more
directly
in the peace negotiations. “We have been telling the Americans
point-blank that you planted the seeds of enmity in Mindanao,” said
MILF spokesman Mohagher Iqbal, from one of its training camps near
Cotabato City. “Had you separated our homeland from the rest of
Luzon
and the Visayas [during the Philippine-American War], there [would
have] been no Moro problem. So please help us address this problem.”
A fragile peace
But the peace talks, which are expected to resume in the coming
weeks after a two-year hiatus, are no guarantee that the Moro “problem”
will be resolved or that terrorism will be kept at bay permanently.
Twenty-eight so-called “high value targets” have been killed
or
captured in the region since 2002, and many of the remaining wanted
individuals have been confined to the remote provinces of Sulu and
Basilan. But both still see regular outbreaks of violence.
During our stay, the local newspapers carried daily multiple
reports
of fire fights and kidnappings in Mindanao. And last year saw
only the
second-ever attack on American troops in the southern Philippines since
their return to the region. Two U.S. soldiers and one Philippines
marine died when their vehicle ran over a landmine last September en
route to a school development project.
In part, the challenge lies not only in the region’s geography
(a
collection of small islands, some no larger than a couple of square
miles) but also in the local communities, which retain an entrenched
antipathy to any officialdom representing Manila.
“Sulu has always been the place of, we say, seasoned
warriors,”
observed Col Aminkadra Undug, commander of airborne special forces for
the AFP. “Some of these people have always been very proud people. They
claim they do not succumb to influence from the outside, even though
it’s their own government.”
‘Where the road ends, terrorism starts’
Poverty also is a big factor.
On Jolo island, for instance, where fishing and fruit farming
are
the main industries, the average fisherman might bring home about $3 or
$4 a day, a fruit farmer even less.
A person “actually living in the Autonomous Region of Muslim
Mindanao area of southern Mindanao will probably die 10 years earlier
than someone in metro Manila,” said Gloria Steele, director of the US
Agency for International Development (USAID) mission in the Philippines.
By Adrienne Mong/ NBC News
Villagers in Panamao Municipality line up
for medical care at a health
clinic set up by Philippine and U.S. security forces.
All of which adds up to persistent conditions ripe for
terrorist
recruitment or an insurgency that promises better governance for its
people. “The international terrorist links fed on the feeling of
dissatisfaction of some fundamentalist groups in that area,” said Dr.
Jennifer Santiago Oreta, who teaches in the department of political
science at Ateneo de Manila University.
To counteract this phenomenon, Filipino and American troops
have
shifted their strategy, focusing even more on community and
development.
“Even if we kill all the high-value targets, that’s not going to
solve the problem,” said U.S. Army Special Forces Major Varman
Chhoeung, the Commander of Task Force Sulu. “The bigger part of
the
problem is denying safe havens. How do you deny safe havens? You only
do that through good governance and through economic growth in the
area.”
The major showed us around Jolo, where he’s stationed with 130
U.S.
troops. In line with the idea that “where the road ends, terrorism
starts,” modest infrastructural improvements have been made across
Jolo.
Roads have been built or repaired. An airstrip was recently
refurbished with the assistance of U.S. troops, enabling the first
commercial flight to land in Jolo. There are projects to build schools
and ongoing plans to establish
more health clinics.
In addition to the American troops’ contributions, USAID has
funneled more than $500 million in assistance to Mindanao since
2002.
“Our programs have focused primarily in the areas of health, education,
energy, good governance, rule of law as well as infrastructure and
economic growth,” said Steele.
In Panamao Municipality, which saw recent skirmishes with what
the
Philippines military call “rogue MILF elements,” there is one hospital
with 10 to 15 beds serving an estimated 44,000 villagers in the
community.
There is “only one doctor, one dentist,” said Dr. Silak
Lakkian, the
chief of the hospital in Panamao. “We have four midwives, and we
have
five nurses.”
The doctor said her hospital had received a lot of what she
called
“disposables” – medicine and some basic medical supplies – from the
Americans. But “that was four years ago,” she said. “[L]ately we
haven’t received any.”
By Adrienne Mong/ NBC News
A street corner in Jolo City, still
dangerous enough that US troops don't like to drive through parts of
it.
‘Defense, diplomacy, development’ “We’re at a critical juncture thanks to the efforts of
our
military operation with USAID and the Armed Forces of the Philippines,”
said Harry Thomas, Jr., the U.S. Ambassador to the Philippines.
“We
are near eliminating the terrorist threat, but we have to sustain it.…
That’s why we’re still trying to do the three tenets: defense,
diplomacy, and development.”
The tenets were a catchphrase the Americans sought to
reinforce in all their interviews with NBC News.
Even the Filipinos talked the talk.
"The focus now is on, instead of defeating the enemy, winning
the
peace," said Bautista, who laid out a seven-point strategy campaign
plan designed to make the Philippines security forces cuddlier.
The ultimate aim, he said, is to become more transparent by
communicating and coordinating with NGOs and other facets of civil
society, conducting polls, and paying greater heed to human rights and
the rule of law.
“The solution … is in the Filipino people, us coming together
and
solving this problem, a whole-of-nation approach, where the entire
citizenry will be involved in solving the internal problem [of
insurgency and terrorism],” said Bautista.
As good as the achievements have been, however, some regional
security analysts have posed the question – does the Philippines still
need U.S. troops to operate in the south?
The AFP and JSOTF-P think so, on the basis of finishing the
job properly.
But sceptics argue there’s another agenda.
One hint: China’s growing strength in the region.
Read more about the China connection in the World Blog
tomorrow
and watch more of Adrienne Mong’s reporting from the Philippines on NBC’s Nightly
News with Brian Williams.
MK V Vessel Base now in Sulu North Borneo Sabah Archipelago
Mainland Chinese & Chinese Sabahan have become very
aggressive about the South China Sea & Sabah respectively,”
Philippines need US because they have no way to defend their
claims in the
Spratly Islands South China Sea and North Borneo Sabah...
Finally,
U.S. developed the areas around General Santos City on southern
Mindanao [island] for long-term preparations against China. That
location cannot be reached by Chinese long-range missiles [and] it’s
suitable for U.S. navy ships.”
We want Uncle Sam?
The Armed Forces of the Philippines is not the only group that
might want a permanent U.S. military presence back in the Philippines.
Villagers on Jolo island do, too – but for entirely different reasons.
“Why not?” said Nurada Abdurajak, a local official in Panamao,
a
city in the province. “They are not harming the people…They are
securing our security here.”
And – in a country which has long enjoyed a close relationship
with
the U.S. – it was a common refrain that the Americans could be relied
upon to provide much-needed aid and assistance. “We [thank] the U.S.
government…for providing us a lot in services and [economic]
development,” said Salim Aloy Jainal, a former mayor of Jolo City.
But the cozy relationship also explains why any potential
tension
between China and the U.S. could prove complicated for the Philippines.
“To us, [the Japan-China territorial dispute in September]
looked
like a showdown,” said Lim. “And it’s disturbing. We have
military
cooperation with the U.S. At the same time, we have economic
cooperation with China. We might be forced into making a choice…We want
help from both sides.”
Filipino Chinese Kim Chiu
Ms.
Earth’ season again, Miss
Earth Jessica Nicole Trisko
(left) returned to Metro Manila Philippine Islands with reigning Miss
Philippines-Earth Karla Paula Henry (Right), and posed for
photographers at a press conference launching the Miss Earth 2008, held
at Traders Hotel Manila
Candidates for the 2009 Miss Philippines
Earth beauty pageant display
placards urging different ways to save Mother Earth during a media
presentation at the Traders Hotel in Pasay City yesterday.
-ROY
DOMINGO
Is a wheelbarrow full
of Orangutan more fun ??
than a regular old barrel full of monkeys?
Katrina Halili
Philippine Star
Pahiyas Pesta - Island of Luzon Philippines
'
Pahiyas Pesta 2
Pahiyas Pesta 3
Pahiyas Pesta 4
Can submarines be used to stop typhoons?
We usually accept it as a given that we can’t change the weather.
When
it
comes
to
extreme
situations
like
hurricanes
or
earthquakes,
such
disasters
are
labeled
“acts
of
god”
because
we
generally
feel
helpless
to
in
the
face
of
nature’s
wrath.
But
recently
an
ambitious
Japanese manufacturing firm Ise Kogyo has boldly claimed that they can
help weaken the impact of typhoons. And even more surprising, the
company’s weapon of choice is the submarine.
In principle, the premise appears
sound. Typhoons generally require warmer water temperatures at surface
level before they become dangerous, typically around 25 degrees. So
when typhoons develop, the theory is that a fleet of submarines
equipped with 20m-long water pumps can deliver colder water to the
surface, thus bringing the surface temperature down by two or three
degrees and weakening the storm.
According to the company, 20 submarines could cover an area of
about
57,000 square meters and they would be deployed into a typhoons path
once initial signs of an oncoming typhoon are evident.
This solution has been proposed as far back as 2002, but we
have yet
to see it practically implemented to date. First of all, submarines are
hardly a dime a dozen and to set 20 of them aside for typhoon
prevention would be no easy task.
More practical proposals involving the use of surface vessels
to
bring up cool water have been put forth before as well, though they are
admittedly far less awesome than the submarine idea. But re-purposing
military ships that patrol key areas might be the only way to bring
such a “pipe dream” to fruition.
These aspirations to control the weather may remind our Asian
readers of China’s pre-Olympic efforts to create blue skies as well as
subsequent struggles to induce rain amid summer droughts
that plagues the agriculture industry there.
The latter procedure is called cloud seeding, and it typically
involves dusting clouds with a silver compound in order to bring about
the formation of rain droplets. In the past however, China’s rainmaker
program drew as much attention for its inadvertent stray rockets
as for its ambitious scope.
Earlier this year a Swiss team working in cloud seeding who,
rather
than use silver compounds, opted to induce water droplet formation
using infrared light.
It remains to be seen whether or not programs like these will
ever
make the transition from experimental to common technologies that
contribute to our safety and our quality of living. But for now, it is
exciting to hear even talk of how humans might gain some mastery over
the weather. With extreme weather patterns becoming more and more
frequent (thanks global warming!) we’re going to need every advantage
we can get.
Sandakan
to
host
Sabah
Games
2009
The competition and technical committee for the Sabah Games (Saga) 2009
has already met twice as it prepares for the Games next year. Youth and
Sports Minister, Peter Pang En Yin said the committee on venue and
equipment had also met once while the implementation committee was
formed recently. Replying to Sekong Assemblyman, Datuk Samsudin Yahya,
he said Sandakan would host the Games.
Japanese tourists want service industry frontliners in Sabah to be
conversant in Japanese language to assist them to get by in the state.
Consul-General of Japan Koichi Morita said Japanese tourists coming to
Sabah had expressed concern over the lack of Japanese-speaking service
providers. "Language barrier had posed problems for them to get around.
Maybe we would like to suggest to have more Japanese language courses
for locals here, especially to those involved in the service industry
like hotels, tourist spots and shopping centres. This will not only
help Japanese tourists but will also be convenient for Japanese ...